X

Email Address:

Password:

Forgot password?
OK

Sign In | Home | Customer Service | About Us | Advertise

advanced search
  • Subscribe
  • Give a Gift
  • Renew
  • Register Online
  • Customer Service
  • Back Issues
  • Buy Articles
  • Donate
    1. The Naked Novelist and the Dead Reputation
      Algis Valiunas
      September 2009
    2. Why Are Jews Liberals?—A Symposium
      David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol and Jeff Jacoby
      September 2009
    3. The Art of Obama Worship
      Michael J. Lewis
      September 2009
    4. Clyde and Bonnie Died for Nihilism
      Stephen Hunter
      July/August 2009
    5. The Path to Republican Revival
      Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
      September 2009
  1. Why Are Jews Liberals?—A Symposium
    David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol and Jeff Jacoby
    September 2009
  2. The Naked Novelist and the Dead Reputation
    Algis Valiunas
    September 2009
  3. The Art of Obama Worship
    Michael J. Lewis
    September 2009
  4. The Path to Republican Revival
    Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
    September 2009
  5. The Path to Republican Revival
    Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
    September 2009

Advertisement



contensions.jpg
about us | contact us | archive | contributors | subscribe to commentary | advertise | RSS

Why Would Anyone Believe Him?

Rick Richman - 11.30.2008 - 3:53 PM

Aluff Benn writes about an exchange George W. Bush reportedly had with Ehud Olmert last week in “Bush to Olmert: Why are you giving Syria the Golan for nothing?”

U.S. President George Bush believes that Israel is offering Syria the Golan Heights without getting anything in exchange, according to sources briefed on his White House meeting with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert last week.

After Olmert updated Bush on Israel’s indirect talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad, the U.S. president demanded, “Why do you want to give Assad the Golan for nothing?” the sources said.

“It’s not for nothing,” Olmert insisted. “It’s in exchange for a change in the region’s strategic alignment.”

Bush persisted: “Why should you believe him?” And to that, Olmert did not reply.

More than six years ago, in his landmark June 24, 2002 speech, Bush invited Syria to join the right side in the war on terror:

Every nation actually committed to peace will stop the flow of money, equipment and recruits to terrorist groups seeking the destruction of Israel — including Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah. Every nation actually committed to peace must block the shipment of Iranian suppoies to these groups, and oppose regimes that promote terror, like Iraq. And Syria must choose the right side in the war on terror by closing terrorist camps and expelling terrorist organizations.

After that, Syria (1) sided with Saddam Hussein just before the 2003 Iraq war, (2) provided refuge in 2003 and thereafter to Ba’athist extremists trying to undermine the new Iraqi government, (3) rejected multiple overtures during 2003-2005 from senior officials of the Bush administration, who repeatedly traveled to Damascus to meet with Asad, (4) was undoubtedly involved in the February 2005 murder of Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri, (5) supported Hezbollah in its 2006 war with Israel, (6) has been restocking Hezbollah since 2006 with double or triple the number of rockets it had before, in violation of the UN resolution that ended the war, (7) was building during all this time a secret nuclear facility with the help of North Korea, (8) still seeks nuclear power, (9) has been providing headquarters and safe haven for the leaders of Hamas, (10) has longstanding ambitions to dominate Lebanon, and (11) is ruled by a dictatorial leader who has forged an alliance with an Iran poised to establish hegemony over the region, once the U.S. withdraws from Iraq.

Syria is likely to view more Israeli and U.S. overtures as signs of weakness (and validation of its prior decisions), rather than as an opportunity to reverse a choice it made more than six years ago, and has confirmed multiple times since. And even if Assad were to make reversible promises of peace (or a “change in strategic alignment”), why would anyone believe him?

»Back to Contentions »Back to Commentary

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Google Google
Facebook Facebook
Email This Post Print This Post Permanent Link To Article


This entry was posted on Sunday, November 30th, 2008 at 3:53 PM and is filed under Contentions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Advertisement

image of latest cover
image of latest cover

FREE SAMPLE ISSUE

  • the complete archive
  • hundreds of authors
  • thousands of articles
  • American history
    since 1945

ENTER THE ARCHIVE

ADVERTISER LINKS

Bad Car Credit
calling card
international phone cards
Nutrition Supplements

Advertisement

--->

Advertisement

Commentary is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).



Home | Subscribe | About Us | Donate | Advertise | Contact Us | Legal Notices | RSS

Copyright © 1997-2009 Commentary Magazine
All Rights Reserved