<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Gift for the Lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242</link>
	<description>The Blog of Commentary Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:04:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shopfloor » Blog Archive &#187; The (Lawyers&#8217;) Limits on Health Care Reform</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/comment-page-1#comment-5442041</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopfloor » Blog Archive &#187; The (Lawyers&#8217;) Limits on Health Care Reform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/?p=148242#comment-5442041</guid>
		<description>[...] possible even as early as Friday. Jennifer Ruben at Commentary reports the legal element, “A Gift for Lawyers&#8220;: A friend points out a little nugget of absurdity and political mendacity in the Pelosi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] possible even as early as Friday. Jennifer Ruben at Commentary reports the legal element, “A Gift for Lawyers&#8220;: A friend points out a little nugget of absurdity and political mendacity in the Pelosi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s non-tort reform. - Moe_Lane&#8217;s blog - RedState</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/comment-page-1#comment-5436322</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s non-tort reform. - Moe_Lane&#8217;s blog - RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/?p=148242#comment-5436322</guid>
		<description>[...] Jen Rubin: Remember Obama’s effort to try a “test” for tort reform? (We don’t actually need a test, since it has worked to lower medical malpractice coverage and help increase access to doctors in states that have tried it.) Well, Pelosi’s bill has an anti-tort-reform measure. On pages 1431-1433 of the 1990 spellbinder, there is a financial incentive for states to try “alternative medical liability laws.” But look — you don’t get the incentive if you have a law that would “limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jen Rubin: Remember Obama’s effort to try a “test” for tort reform? (We don’t actually need a test, since it has worked to lower medical malpractice coverage and help increase access to doctors in states that have tried it.) Well, Pelosi’s bill has an anti-tort-reform measure. On pages 1431-1433 of the 1990 spellbinder, there is a financial incentive for states to try “alternative medical liability laws.” But look — you don’t get the incentive if you have a law that would “limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moe Lane &#187; Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s non-tort reform.</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/comment-page-1#comment-5436312</link>
		<dc:creator>Moe Lane &#187; Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s non-tort reform.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/?p=148242#comment-5436312</guid>
		<description>[...] Jen Rubin: Remember Obama’s effort to try a “test” for tort reform? (We don’t actually need a test, since it has worked to lower medical malpractice coverage and help increase access to doctors in states that have tried it.) Well, Pelosi’s bill has an anti-tort-reform measure. On pages 1431-1433 of the 1990 spellbinder, there is a financial incentive for states to try “alternative medical liability laws.” But look — you don’t get the incentive if you have a law that would “limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jen Rubin: Remember Obama’s effort to try a “test” for tort reform? (We don’t actually need a test, since it has worked to lower medical malpractice coverage and help increase access to doctors in states that have tried it.) Well, Pelosi’s bill has an anti-tort-reform measure. On pages 1431-1433 of the 1990 spellbinder, there is a financial incentive for states to try “alternative medical liability laws.” But look — you don’t get the incentive if you have a law that would “limit attorneys’ fees or impose caps on damages.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dems: You can have tort reform &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/comment-page-1#comment-5436282</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dems: You can have tort reform &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/?p=148242#comment-5436282</guid>
		<description>[...] damages, such as those already in place in California and a handful of other states.  Jen Rubin at Commentary notices that Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s bill does actually allow for tort reform on pages 1431-1433 of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] damages, such as those already in place in California and a handful of other states.  Jen Rubin at Commentary notices that Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s bill does actually allow for tort reform on pages 1431-1433 of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Personal Promise Undone</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/comment-page-1#comment-5434092</link>
		<dc:creator>A Personal Promise Undone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/?p=148242#comment-5434092</guid>
		<description>[...] The following, however, Really. Pisses. Me. Off. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The following, however, Really. Pisses. Me. Off. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buried on page 1431: Potemkin tort reform</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/comment-page-1#comment-5433822</link>
		<dc:creator>Buried on page 1431: Potemkin tort reform</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/?p=148242#comment-5433822</guid>
		<description>[...] Jennifer Rubin notices: A friend points out a little nugget of absurdity and political mendacity in the Pelosi health-care [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jennifer Rubin notices: A friend points out a little nugget of absurdity and political mendacity in the Pelosi health-care [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-reform incentives in House health bill</title>
		<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/148242/comment-page-1#comment-5433631</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-reform incentives in House health bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/?p=148242#comment-5433631</guid>
		<description>[...] Rubin at Commentary has the scoop on how the bill&#8217;s language will reward states financially if they do not &#8220;limit [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rubin at Commentary has the scoop on how the bill&#8217;s language will reward states financially if they do not &#8220;limit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
