Will The Other Kennedy Help?
- 01.27.2008 - 11:06 PMDoes Senator Ted Kennedy’s Barack Obama endorsement matter? Well, unlike Maureen Dowd, I don’t think he needs the boost with upscale liberals pining for the second Camelot. However, to the extent organized labor, working-class voters more generally, and other prominent Democratic politicians take their cue from Kennedy, the impact could be significant. It would be a signal that even the stalwart establishment Democrats have had enough of the Bill/Hillary carnival and are ready to move on. Most important, Kennedy may be influential with those 796 super delegates, who make up about 20 percent of the Democratic delegate total. That’s a lot of persuadable Democratic office holders and DNC officials.
Kennedy or no Kennedy, many have looked at the South Carolina totals and remarked, “Yeah, but he’s not going to win California.” That may be, and the demographics there likely favor Hillary. However, California, like all Democratic primaries, awards its delegates proportionally. So Obama still stands to gain a fair share of delegates. The same is true of Hillary-leaning states like New York and New Jersey. On February 5 Obama may be counting on Illinois, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, Missouri and maybe even liberal Connecticut (all those Lamont voters).
Given all this, it would seem almost certain that the Democratic race will not be settled on February 5. We will then head on to states like Louisiana (February 9), Maryland and Virginia (February 12), Wisconsin (February 19), Ohio and Texas (March 4) ,and if the political junkies are lucky, maybe even Pennsylvania( April 22).
This may raise an interesting question for voters in my home state of Virginia, which does not require registration by party. As I and many others walk into the booth we will have a choice of which primary to vote in. It may be that the GOP race is far more settled than the Democratic race by then. Hmmm…
| »Back to Contentions | »Back to Commentary |
January 27th, 2008 at 11:36 PM
Oh come on… you can’t be promoting a Kos style “manipulate the other primary” strategy. Its so… lame.
January 27th, 2008 at 11:38 PM
I would not be so sanguine about being embraced by Ted for fear that I might be Kopechnied.
January 28th, 2008 at 1:09 AM
Teddy must view Hillary as unelectable, and views the Clinton money raising machine as transferable to another dynasty. Unless of course, this is part of a devious plot to elect her after all. Not having the Kennedy endorsement would be a plus in the election campaign. And of course Carter might be persuaded to endorse Obama at a strategic moment.
A devious plot? Take Bill’s dissing Obama before the S.C. primary. He occupied enough Media time to eliminate a substantial amount of coverage that Giuliani needed for his strategy to work. Giuliani appeared to be the candidate most likely to beat Hillary. And Bill’s criticism evidently did not make a noticeable change in the expected S.C. outcome.