X

Email Address:

Password:

Forgot password?
OK

Sign In | Home | Customer Service | About Us | Advertise

advanced search
  • Subscribe
  • Give a Gift
  • Renew
  • Register Online
  • Customer Service
  • Back Issues
  • Buy Articles
  • Donate
    1. The Naked Novelist and the Dead Reputation
      Algis Valiunas
      September 2009
    2. Why Are Jews Liberals?—A Symposium
      David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol and Jeff Jacoby
      September 2009
    3. The Art of Obama Worship
      Michael J. Lewis
      September 2009
    4. Clyde and Bonnie Died for Nihilism
      Stephen Hunter
      July/August 2009
    5. The Path to Republican Revival
      Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
      September 2009
  1. Why Are Jews Liberals?—A Symposium
    David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol and Jeff Jacoby
    September 2009
  2. The Naked Novelist and the Dead Reputation
    Algis Valiunas
    September 2009
  3. The Art of Obama Worship
    Michael J. Lewis
    September 2009
  4. The Path to Republican Revival
    Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
    September 2009
  5. The Path to Republican Revival
    Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
    September 2009

Advertisement



contensions.jpg
about us | contact us | archive | contributors | subscribe to commentary | advertise | RSS

Flotsam and Jetsam

Jennifer Rubin - 08.23.2008 - 11:20 AM

With Joe Biden you can add to the list of themes that have gone by the wayside for Barack Obama: “experience doesn’t matter.”

A sampling of all the fun things ahead with a Biden VP pick. The most effective part of the new McCain ad? That chin-in-the-air, arrogant Obama expression. That’s plain luck to get it on the same shot as the Biden comment.

Things like this give the Congressional Republicans hope that they can keep the losses to a minimum.

“Celebrity news” — the Obama purse. Pretty sure this isn’t a clever McCain ad. Not yet.

Michael Kinsley must be out to build Republicans’ self-esteem, accusing them of “genius, courage, creativity and utter ruthlessness” in presidential politics. The real secret? Luck — the Democrats seem to have a knack for finding the worst candidate. Really a 1.4% lead in this political year?

Not everyone thinks George W. Bush is responsible for every bad thing in the world: “I know that many folk will prefer to point fingers at Bush — this mistake and that — but the fact is that Moscow has acted in the last two weeks in a continuous and logical extension from its aggressive politics over the last few years.”

Obama’s so-called money advantage not only doesn’t seem to matter, it’s not real. And the DNC is reduced to fibbing about their fundraising. And apparently it is time to stop wasting some of that money on some faux battleground states.

Playing the Rezko card: Lynn Sweet asks why John McCain would succeed when Hillary Clinton did not. Aside from the Clintons being defective messengers on any ethics issue and the press never really spending much time on it during the primary (too busy defending The One), voters have a funny way of getting serious when they vote for the President as opposed to a nominee.

Victor Davis Hanson gives Obama advice he’ll never (but should) receive: “Barack! You are running for the top job in America, so when you mention the U.S., or its history, just dispense with the Harvard qualifiers, the howevers and buts, the oppression studies talking points, the morally equivalent cute examples, the tangled legal nuances, and professorial huffing, and simply say nice things about your country, and if you can’t, don’t say anything at all about it. The voters know that you believe America is not perfect, but they don’t know whether you believe it is good.”

Former prosecutor Andy McCarthy delivers the closing argument on Obama’s record on the Born Alive Infants legislation: “So he has lied about what he did. He has offered various conflicting explanations, ranging from the assertion that he didn’t oppose the anti-infanticide legislation (he did), to the assertion that he opposed it because it didn’t contain a superfluous clause reaffirming abortion rights (it did), to the assertion that it was unnecessary because Illinois law already protected the children of botched abortions (it didn’t — and even if it arguably did, why oppose a clarification?).” Read what Obama said at the time. Chilling.

Were pundits’ expectations too high or is Obama just a terribly flawed candidate? I vote for the latter.

Huffington Post has a point: the “santuary manison” really was one of Rudy Giuliani’s better lines.

»Back to Contentions »Back to Commentary

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Google Google
Facebook Facebook
Email This Post Print This Post Permanent Link To Article


This entry was posted on Saturday, August 23rd, 2008 at 11:20 AM and is filed under Contentions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Advertisement

image of latest cover
image of latest cover

FREE SAMPLE ISSUE

  • the complete archive
  • hundreds of authors
  • thousands of articles
  • American history
    since 1945

ENTER THE ARCHIVE

ADVERTISER LINKS

Bad Car Credit
calling card
international phone cards
Nutrition Supplements

Advertisement

--->

Advertisement

Commentary is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).



Home | Subscribe | About Us | Donate | Advertise | Contact Us | Legal Notices | RSS

Copyright © 1997-2009 Commentary Magazine
All Rights Reserved