X

Email Address:

Password:

Forgot password?
OK

Sign In | Home | Customer Service | About Us | Advertise

advanced search
  • Subscribe
  • Give a Gift
  • Renew
  • Register Online
  • Customer Service
  • Back Issues
  • Buy Articles
  • Donate
    1. The Naked Novelist and the Dead Reputation
      Algis Valiunas
      September 2009
    2. Why Are Jews Liberals?—A Symposium
      David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol and Jeff Jacoby
      September 2009
    3. The Art of Obama Worship
      Michael J. Lewis
      September 2009
    4. Clyde and Bonnie Died for Nihilism
      Stephen Hunter
      July/August 2009
    5. The Path to Republican Revival
      Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
      September 2009
  1. Why Are Jews Liberals?—A Symposium
    David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol and Jeff Jacoby
    September 2009
  2. The Naked Novelist and the Dead Reputation
    Algis Valiunas
    September 2009
  3. The Art of Obama Worship
    Michael J. Lewis
    September 2009
  4. The Path to Republican Revival
    Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
    September 2009
  5. The Path to Republican Revival
    Peter Wehner and Michael Gerson
    September 2009

Advertisement



contensions.jpg
about us | contact us | archive | contributors | subscribe to commentary | advertise | RSS

Flotsam and Jetsam

Jennifer Rubin - 09.24.2008 - 7:41 AM

Caroline Glick says it all on the topic of the anti-Iran rally and the snub of Sarah Palin.

Another day, another false Obama ad.

At 1:50 on the clock Greta stumps Bill Clinton: what is the difference between an association with Reverend Wright and with David Duke? Clinton thinks we don’t have to “go there” because Barack Obama left Trinity United. Just one question: why wasn’t Obama ever asked this?

A preview of what’s ahead from the McCain camp’s arsenal. But if there is nothing “new” will the public care?

Mickey Kaus is right: Let Biden be Biden!

Isn’t it a bit bizarre — not to mention embarrasing — that Congressional Democrats need marching orders from John McCain before they vote on the bailout? (Embarrassing both for Congressional Democrats and for Barack Obama, who after all is the leader of their party.) And what if McCain won’t tell them until the end of the vote? Not exactly profiles in courage.

After the ” no coal here” comments reported yesterday the Obama-Biden ticket likely has even more work to do in Scranton. (”Mine, baby, mine” doesn’t quite have the ring of “Drill, baby, drill” does it?)

Funniest line yet on on the “FDR went on TV in ‘29″ gaffe: “If Palin had said something like that, the MSM would have sent her back to Alaska and frozen her in an iceberg with the woolly mammoths.”

Here’s a map and some helpful stats explaining all about these potential Biden-deterred votes.

“Racism could Hurt Obama in Pennsylvania” is the headline. But Bidenism is a worse problem, no?

I was ruminating the other day about a 269-269 electoral vote tie. Now someone has done the legwork. Pretty fun for political junkies.

A guide for the perplexed (about the mortgage mess, that is) is here.

A very credible and tough Obama interview on Today by Matt Lauer. Perhaps it is fair to distinguish between NBC and MSNBC.

Yet another example of “reader beware” when it comes to polls.

Obama decides giving a forum to Ahmadinejad isn’t a good thing after all. So are talks with him now also a bad idea?

An apt description of the UN here: it is “best represented by the hundreds and hundreds of black limousines ferrying around the east side of Manhattan on the occasion of the annual autumn jamboree of the General Assembly. I cannot imagine a more vivid picture of indulgence, sloth, self-satisfaction, pomposity and waste than this fest of the representatives of the abysmally poor.”

James Taranto tries to puzzle out the Washington Post’s criticism of the McCain ad that relied on the Post’s reporting: “But if the Washington Post is not a reliable source of information, how can we believe the Washington Post when it says it’s not a reliable source of information? But if we don’t believe the Washington Post when it says it’s not a reliable source of information, then we must believe the Washington Post is a reliable source of information, in which case how can we believe the Washington Post is not a reliable source of information. But if . . .”

»Back to Contentions »Back to Commentary

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Google Google
Facebook Facebook
Email This Post Print This Post Permanent Link To Article


This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 24th, 2008 at 7:41 AM and is filed under Contentions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Advertisement

image of latest cover
image of latest cover

FREE SAMPLE ISSUE

  • the complete archive
  • hundreds of authors
  • thousands of articles
  • American history
    since 1945

ENTER THE ARCHIVE

ADVERTISER LINKS

Bad Car Credit
calling card
international phone cards
Nutrition Supplements

Advertisement

--->

Advertisement

Commentary is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).



Home | Subscribe | About Us | Donate | Advertise | Contact Us | Legal Notices | RSS

Copyright © 1997-2009 Commentary Magazine
All Rights Reserved