Obama Got His Dander Up When Wright Came After Him
- 04.29.2008 - 10:18 PMI am not alone in recognizing that what seems to have gotten Barack Obama particularly peeved is that Reverand Wright made a spectacle of himself and questioned Obama’s sincerity as non-politician. Obama explained: “I’m particularly distressed that this has caused such a distraction from what this campaign should be about, which is the American people.”
In response to a question Obama said:
And what I think particularly angered me was his suggestion somehow that my previous denunciation of his remarks were somehow political posturing. Anybody who knows me and anybody who knows what I’m about knows that — that I am about trying to bridge gaps and that I see the — the commonality in all people.
Again Obama made clear how personal this is, how much he feels slighted:
Well, the — I want to use this press conference to make people absolutely clear that obviously whatever relationship I had with Reverend Wright has changed as a consequence of this. I don’t think that he showed much concern for me. I don’t — more importantly, I don’t think he showed much concern for what we are trying to do in this campaign and what we’re trying to do for the American people and with the American people. . .But at a certain point, if what somebody says contradicts what you believe so fundamentally, and then he questions whether or not you believe it in front of the National Press Club, then that’s enough. That’s — that’s a show of disrespect to me. It’s a — it is also, I think, an insult to what we’ve been trying to do in this campaign.
So what is “particularly” noteworthy is what got Obama angry: Wright’s lack of loyalty and concern for him. Now ,that’s natural, I suppose, but it also shows a strange ranking of priorities. Insulting his country, spouting bizarre conspiracy theories, voicing racism and much more — none of that is what “particularly” triggered a repudiation. That, as much as the intellectual inconsistency (”I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother”), should provoke concern among people looking for a selfless leader for the new era in American politics.
And one final note: Obama denied that Wright was his “spiritual mentor.” I have yet to find an instance in which that exact phrase came from Obama’s lips, but it has been use incessently by the media without a hint of objection by the Obama team. Obama came close to saying the same thing many times including in this interview in March:
You know, I guess — keep in mind that, just to provide more context, this is somebody who I had known for 20 years. Pastor Wright has been a pastor for 30 years. He’s an ex-Marine. He is somebody who is a biblical scholar, has spoken at theological seminaries all across the country, from the University of Chicago to Hampton. And so he is a well- regarded preacher. And somebody who is known for talking about the social gospel. . . . I mean, obviously, understand that — understand that, you know, this is somebody who is like an uncle. If you have — to me. He’s somebody who helped me find Christ. And somebody who always talked to me in very powerful ways about relationship to God and our obligations to the poor. If somebody makes a mistake, then obviously, you recognize — I make mistakes. We all make mistakes. If I thought that that was the repeated tenor of the church, then I wouldn’t feel comfortable there. But, frankly, that has not been my experience at Trinity United Church of Christ.
But that inconsistency seems to be the least of his worries. (Among his bigger concerns: the latest poll numbers. Yikes.)
| »Back to Contentions | »Back to Commentary |





















April 29th, 2008 at 11:03 PM
Nice post, but which poll numbers are you referring to? Obama still has a sizable lead in NC, and the tracking polls are pretty meaningless now. I’m shocked that the Wright scandal and the Ayers scandal haven’t done more damage to Obama in the polls, but they haven’t. Am I missing something?
April 30th, 2008 at 2:39 AM
Yes, phant, you’re missing something: the newly emergent idiocracy.
April 30th, 2008 at 6:00 AM
Wait until the election on Tuesday to see the real fallout from the Wright affair. The polls have not been accurate this year.
Jennifer is right, though, that the only language the Democratic left and leadership understand is that of power and the loss of it. They don’t care how hypocritical Obama has been (and by extension they have been by touting his line that he is a post-racial, unifying candidate) and what a liar he has been, as long as they can win the election. If they lose the election because of his “issues”, then they will learn the lesson about playing with racism and dishonest sloganeering.
For liberals, winning is what matters, and they must be dealt a humiliating defeat this year to understand that black racism and hatred-mongering is no more acceptable in America today than white racism and hate-mongering.
April 30th, 2008 at 6:30 AM
The poll numbers from Kentucky should not be surprising. To get an idea of how dominant Hillary will be, take a look at the counties bordering Kentucky in states that have already voted. In Tennessee and Virginia, every county along the Kentucky border voted for Hillary. Buchanan County, Virginia favored her 90% to 9%. Macon County, Tennessee gave her 76% with John Edwards (who had already dropped out) getting 13% and Obama 9%.
Every Ohio county along the Kentucky border except Hamilton County (Cincinnati) went for Hillary, with Scioto County going 81% to 16%. Even most Illinois counties on the Kentucky border favored Hillary.
And all of those primaries came before Jeremiah Wright made the news.