X

Email Address:

Password:

Forgot password?
OK

Commentary

Sign In | Home | Customer Service | About Us | Advertise
PRINT SUBSCRIBERS: REGISTER FOR ONLINE ACCESS

advanced search
  • Subscribe
  • Give a Gift
  • Renew
  • Register Online
  • Customer Service
  • Back Issues
  • Buy Articles
  • Donate
    1. Obama and Race
      Linda Chavez
      June 2008
    2. Gandhi and Churchill by Arthur Herman
      Mark Falcoff
      June 2008
    3. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians: Annotated Text
      Efraim Karsh
    4. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians—
      The True Story

      Efraim Karsh
      May 2008
    5. Land That I Love
      Joseph I. Lieberman
  1. Obama and Race
    Linda Chavez
    June 2008
  2. Gandhi and Churchill by Arthur Herman
    Mark Falcoff
    June 2008
  3. What Does Reform Judaism Stand For?
    Jack Wertheimer
    June 2008
  4. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians: Annotated Text
    Efraim Karsh
  5. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians—
    The True Story

    Efraim Karsh
    May 2008

Advertisement

Advertisement

contensions.jpg
about us | contact us | archive | contributors | subscribe to commentary | advertise | RSS
commentary's blogs: the horizon | contentions | connecting the dots

That’s the Point

Jennifer Rubin - 05.06.2008 - 6:22 PM

In the back and forth between John McCain and the Democrats over today’s speech on judges, Barack Obama’s campaign chief uttered this unintentionally incriminating comment:

Barack Obama has always believed that our courts should stand up for social and economic justice, and what’s truly elitist is to appoint judges who will protect the powerful and leave ordinary Americans to fend for themselves.

Actually, judges aren’t supposed to stand up for some poorly defined notion of social–let alone economic–justice. The job of federal court judges is to interpret the Constitution and statutes. As for letting people “fend for themselves,” there are two other branches of government out there (you’ve heard of them, maybe?) which spend quite a bit of time attempting to achieve social fairness and practicing economic redistribution.

So, if McCain’s staffers were smart, they’d respond to David Axelrod’s confession that his boss believes in judicial imperialism with: “See, told you so.”

»Back to Contentions »Back to Commentary

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Google Google
Facebook Facebook
Email This Post Print This Post Permanent Link To Article


This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 6th, 2008 at 6:22 PM and is filed under Contentions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “That’s the Point”

  1. 1
    Matt Says:
    May 6th, 2008 at 7:33 PM

    Mullahs of the west.

  2. 2
    J.E. Dyer Says:
    May 6th, 2008 at 7:48 PM

    How I wish judges would leave me alone to fend for myself.

  3. 3
    Ritchie Emmons Says:
    May 6th, 2008 at 7:53 PM

    I would be so thrilled if a McCain Presidency could nominate a couple more John Roberts to the SC.

  4. 4
    Forbes Says:
    May 6th, 2008 at 10:41 PM

    Please, can we get the Democrats on the record like this a little more often…

    Except it does scare me a little, because many Americans agree with Axelrod’s sentiment when it works in their favor.

    Unfortunately, many of my fellow Americans don’t understand the separation of powers and checks and balances, in the manner they work under our Constitution. Sad.

Leave a Reply

Advertisement

image of latest cover
image of latest cover

FREE SAMPLE ISSUE

  • the complete archive
  • hundreds of authors
  • thousands of articles
  • American history
    since 1945

ENTER THE ARCHIVE

ADVERTISER LINKS

Illustrations by Terry Colon
Secured Loans
Used Cars
Car Loans
Debt Consolidation Loan
Car Finance
Bad Car Credit
Debt Management
Used Cars
Concert Tickets 
Compare Secured Loans
Life Insurance
Boat Hire
Cut to the News



Advertisement


Advertisement

Commentary is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Home | Subscribe | About Us | Donate | Advertise | Contact Us | Legal Notices | RSS

Commentar

Copyright © 1997-2007 Commentary Magazine
All Rights Reserved