- Commentary - http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs -

Powell Loves Racial Preferences and the Judge Devoted to Them

Posted By Jennifer Rubin On July 6, 2009 @ 4:35 PM In Contentions | 21 Comments

Colin Powell on CNN’s State of the Union  [1]on Sunday spoke out in favor of Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination. It was vintage Powell — the Powell who is light on facts, wedded to affirmative action, dismissive of critics, and either factually ill-informed or banking on his audience being so. Asked about Sotomayor, he declared:

She’s from my neighborhood, yes. She seems like a very gifted and accomplished woman. She certainly has an open and liberal bent of mind, but that’s not disqualifying. But she seems to have a judicial record that seems to be balanced and tries to follow the law.

What we can’t continue to have is to have somebody like a Judge Sotomayor who is announced, and based on one simple tricky but nonetheless case at the Supreme Court has now decided, have her called a racist, a reverse-racist, and she ought to withdraw her nomination because we’re mad at her.

First, there is the trademark provincialism. Obama was “transformative,” as in, how great to have an African American president! And Sotomayor is from his neighborhood. Case closed, right?

Any support for his declarative statements that she has a “open mind”? Or that she is “very gifted”? None. Even Robert Gibbs offers a bit more than such bare bones talking-points. And then the misrepresentation: it is only “one tricky case” that has her branded a “reverse-racist”? No, there are, among other things, a lifetime of speeches, her disdain for objectivity, an utterly unprofessional and devious attempt to deprive Frank Ricci and others of their day in court,  and more than a decade of radical racial politics advocated through PRLDEF. And is any elected official “mad” or demanding the nomination to be withdrawn? No. Are many groups very much concerned about her ability to set her biases aside? Are they calling for a tough hearing or votes against her in the Senate? Yes. But you wouldn’t pick up on any of that listening to Powell.

This is the same sort of non-analytical and ad hominem attack we saw on display when Powell endorsed Obama for president while smearing John McCain for being insufficiently vigilant in policing racism in his party. Let’s be honest on Sotomayor: Powell has long been a fan of racial preferences. Indeed, he explains just how enamored he is of institutional discrimination in favor of minorities:

Now, affirmative action is an issue that I thought about and worried about for many, many years. But let me summarize it this way. If you have a public institution, say, a college, such as a college I went to, City College in New York, where you’re responsible for educating the public, not just a part of the public but the public.

And as you are looking at your student population, if you find that there are some parts of the public who are not properly represented in your institution, shouldn’t you do something about that? Don’t you have an obligation to do something about it?

You don’t have an obligation to bring in anybody who is not able to do the work. You should always have qualifications. But once you’ve established those qualifications, is there something wrong with a taxpayer-funded institution not making sure that it is representing the entire public, the entire population?

And I think that’s a good rule for private institutions as well. Call it affirmative action, call it diversity. It goes under a lots of different names. I have a hunch that maybe 55 years ago somebody took a look at my rather mediocre high school grades, but at the same time, thought, maybe this kid can make it, and let me into the City College of New York.

As such, Powell should be honest that Sotomayor is precisely the sort of Supreme Court Justice to preserve and extend quotas and racial preferences which are so near and dear to Powell. But it is so much easier to mischaracterize the opponents of Sotomayor.

Nevertheless, Powell is quite helpful in clarifying what is at issue with regard to Sotomayor’s nomination: if you love racial preferences as much as Powell does, Sotomayor is the Supreme Court Justice for you. As she showed in Ricci, she’ll pull out all the stops to protect the system of racial spoils, which her colleagues at PRLDEF and other left-wing activist groups struggle so hard to preserve.


21 Comments (Open | Close)

21 Comments To "Powell Loves Racial Preferences and the Judge Devoted to Them"

#1 Comment By RCAR On July 6, 2009 @ 5:06 PM

I heard a good one today that makes SS really look like an ass—e. It seems that someone was in jail wrongfully convicted and the defense lawyer filed his papers past a deadline,but the deadline given to him by the court was a mistake. She ruled against the innocent defendant,and he stayed in jail seven more years. She felt it wasn’t her job to interfere in this snafu. You all might change your mind about her based on this,sounds like a Roberts or Alito decision.

#2 Comment By Chris Bolts Sr. On July 6, 2009 @ 5:18 PM

I don’t know why that is Sotomayor’s fault. It sounds to me that the criminal had an incompetent lawyer. Maybe the lawyer figured the guy was not innocent. :P

#3 Comment By Forbes On July 6, 2009 @ 5:30 PM

It is too bad that race and ethnicity have turned into another cog in the rent-seeking political spoils system–akin to farm subsidies, Davis-Bacon wage rules, et al. Just another interest group seeking space at the feeding trough. Whoever thought a colorblind society possible missed this outcome by a country mile. MLK must be rolling in his grave.

#4 Comment By Theo Goodwin On July 6, 2009 @ 5:32 PM

Powell says:

“And I think that’s a good rule for private institutions as well. Call it affirmative action, call it diversity. It goes under a lots of different names.”

Hey, Colin babe, let’s call it by its name: DISPARATE IMPACT. Sotomayor wants to enforce disparate impact with a vengeance. That means nothing more nor less than QUOTAS. Sotomayor should be rejected for supporting QUOTAS. Republicans who do not roast her fully on this issue are turncoats. All the logical points are in their favor.

#5 Comment By Neo On July 6, 2009 @ 5:47 PM

Lee Harvey Oswald had that “one simple tricky but nonetheless” bad day in Dallas, but he was for “fair play” (for Cuba).

#6 Comment By JW On July 6, 2009 @ 8:21 PM

“Affirmative Action” existed in the southern states before the defeat of Jim Crow in the 1960s; namely, there was “affirmative action” for white people. Different treatment under the law according to race is a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which is why Jim Crow was finally ended. Now Colin Powell and the like support it. And why are “Latinos” included in the now-favored groups?
Colin Powell and his like should study the Declaration of Independence.

#7 Comment By Nolanimrod On July 6, 2009 @ 8:43 PM

My fondest memory of this selfless patriot is from the days of the Rodney King riots, when the LA mob once again turned out to beat on people between forays into the television-stealing business and Korean-store-torching business.

It was when he stepped up to the microphone and, as a black person and as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he calmed the crowd by saying, “Well, I think it’s almost impossible for a black person to make anything of himself in this country.”

Given his performance as Secretary of State at the U.N. I’d have to agree that he was right about one black person.

#8 Comment By Danton On July 6, 2009 @ 9:27 PM

Mister Powell and Ms. Sotomayor should heed the rich cultural experience of this Eastern-European descended White Male.
When my Mother was a little girl, she sat on Grandpa’s knee, and he told her this:

“Someday this country will be Socialist”.

I have never forgotten this story, related to me by my Mother.

My Grandfather came from Europe as a young person, to this great country, as did my Grandmother.
They both were proud to become AMERICANS, making it through hard times and raising five children (My uncle and aunts) to be good citizens.

Obama may be a Black Man, he may be a US citizen (doubtedly so), Sotomayor may be a Hispanic, she might even be as much of a woman as Sarah Palin although she seems to be a creature from academia….but one thing is certain:

THEY ARE SOCIALISTISTS.

Grandpa, you knew more than they did.
Another example of the richness of my family’s roots, learned from firsthand experience with an evil world.

Thank You Grandpa, Thank you Mom for warning me about today.

#9 Comment By Zoltan Newberry On July 6, 2009 @ 10:28 PM

I’m all for sending Colin P a Mao cap with a red star on it.

Tell him there’s even room for confused African American Maoists like him in our big tent.

How many $30,000.00 and up honorariums has Colin P collected for his canned 15 minute speeches to dozens of JUF dinners from sea to shining sea? The guy is just rolling in Jewish money.

Yep, so is 0bama.

Didn’t the Jews give Jesse Jackson his start?

Where would Calypso Louie be without the Jews?

If we stopped paying them, maybe they’d shut up already.

#10 Comment By FIGMO JOHN On July 6, 2009 @ 11:44 PM

Way to go, Jenny! It’s simply horrid for that Negro Mr. Powell to have accepted admission to college in the first place.
To think that he would have the nerve to think that other undeserving dark-skinned people might hope or the same type of treatment is almost too much for you to have to bear. You’re just so right to heap scorn on this man!
We gave him preferential treatment and what did we get back from him?

#11 Comment By Seth Halpern On July 7, 2009 @ 1:07 AM

#10, I’ve asked myself that question for nearly a quarter century and haven’t come up with an answer. What was so great about Powell anyway?

So far as I can tell his career was a tribute to a faintly condescending Republican brand of noblesse oblige. Or maybe most genuinely talented military guys these days get out before they make general so Powell simply followed Woody Allen’s advice by just showing up.

#12 Comment By Brian On July 7, 2009 @ 2:27 AM

If ppl knew how pervasive racial quotas are in this country there would be a revolution, listen folks, when you are denied a position in college or employment based on your race they don’t tell you. I was denied a position in a nursing program for years despite having a 3.77 GPA. Minorities only needed a 2.00 GPA to enter. I only found this out because I sat next to several black ppl that told me they were accepted based on keeping a 2.00 GPA. I never had a chance.

#13 Comment By Kevin On July 7, 2009 @ 2:42 AM

Powell is a pitiful man, a disparate racist. What he says should be forgottem. It is worthless.

#14 Comment By On the Right On July 7, 2009 @ 9:34 AM

“If ppl knew how pervasive racial quotas are in this country there would be a revolution”

………

Eh, maybe.

Certainly it is true that the sort of people in charge of administering/enforcing the various Quotas (not just racial) at universities (both student-admissions and faculty-hiring), law-firms and corporations, government agencies, et al., have developed an authentic mastery in the arts of covering their tracks. Their like-minded colleagues in the media have developed a similar mastery to prevent the issue from becoming openly discussed, except in the vaguest-possible terms and at very distant, irregular intervals. So a certain level of public ignorance about this issue is understandable, perhaps inevitable.

But still and all, the essential components of the “Quota-System” have been in place now for three or four decades. Don’t you suppose that most Americans, at some point in that time, one way or another, have brushed up against that system, or at least had a chance to see its effect on daily life? There are literally tens of millions of people in this country who have been similarly situated to what Frank Ricci went through (and is still going through) in New Haven. If, after all these years, they still haven’t decided “Enough Is Enough” I begin to wonder if they ever will.

#15 Comment By Seth Halpern On July 7, 2009 @ 10:30 AM

#14, let’s see what happens if we combine rampant quotas with Obamanomics. The economy since 1980 arguably provided adequate opportunity (however bubble-based in retrospect) even for those who felt swindled by affirmative action. Where prosperity itself is politically rationed, the stakes are higher.

#16 Comment By On the Right On July 7, 2009 @ 10:52 AM

The scenario you sketch out is possible, though I’m not holding my breath.

We’ll see.

#17 Comment By Margo On July 7, 2009 @ 11:17 AM

One great negative effect of quotas and affirmative action is on minority-group members.

First, the constant messages of “you will be rewarded even if you don’t do as well,” and “you couldn’t possibly win this on your own merits” keep people, especially the young, in a bubble. Not coming up against hard competition or demands, they are not as well prepared for encountering reality where your best efforts might not succeed.

Then, minority-group members are deliberately placed in schools and jobs where they are in competition with others who have way better preparation or qualifications. Either the affirmative action thing has to continue, as in the firefighters case, or the minority flunks out, can’t pass the bar exam, can’t bring in the business, etc.

Why were the black firefighters as a group so much less qualified than the whites? Perhaps because more qualified blacks who actually were the equals of the white firefighters who passed the test had already been recruited for more prestigious or well-paying kinds of work, through affirmative action. Both they and their firefighter colleagues are doomed to remain at the bottom of the ladder, having been placed above their skill sets in the first place.

#18 Comment By FIGMO JOHN On July 7, 2009 @ 3:42 PM

“Well Qualified”, soon to be confirmed and seated, and the rest is just Rubinababble.

#19 Comment By Robert G.S. Plant, USN,Ret. On July 7, 2009 @ 6:29 PM

Colin Powell, General Officer, USA, Retired as any good American, took advantage of the opportunities presented, attended college, joined the Army (in his own words, “it was a job, and I needed one.) climbed the ladder of “diversity” and rose to the the very pinnacle of military leadeship. By and large, provided a credible execuktion of office. Until he was thwarted in his desire to capitulate Iraq. Then the “flag” came off, and his true allegiances were revealed. African-American? Not really. The constant hyphenization of Americans is something that should cease in Conservative speech! You are African, or Mexican, or French, or German, et al. Hey! We are, all of us, each of us, Americans! If not, we are of some other nation! Give it up already with the dual identification nomenclature! White American would include the hispanics, if they are (North) American. Blacks, Indians (because Columbus was less than an accurate navigator) but even so, they are Americans. Not “Native Americans” and it goes on. Space is short. The point is made. Powell is what he is, and supports the Statist redistribution of power and wealth. To the detriment of the Republic of the United States of America.

#20 Comment By Robert G.S. Plant, USN,Ret. On July 7, 2009 @ 6:31 PM

Thought that I had. Wondere what happened to it. Hmmm?

#21 Pingback By Blawg Review #220 On July 13, 2009 @ 3:41 AM

[...] that: The Sotomayor nomination continued to be a notable topic in the legal blogosphere this week. Jennifer Rubin noted that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, sharing Judge Sotomayor’s position favoring [...]


Article printed from Commentary: http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs

URL to article: http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/rubin/72362

URLs in this post:

[1] CNN’s State of the Union : http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0907/05/sotu.01.html