X

Email Address:

Password:

Forgot password?
OK

Commentary

Sign In | Home | Customer Service | About Us | Advertise
PRINT SUBSCRIBERS: REGISTER FOR ONLINE ACCESS

advanced search
  • Subscribe
  • Give a Gift
  • Renew
  • Register Online
  • Customer Service
  • Back Issues
  • Buy Articles
  • Donate
    1. Obama and Race
      Linda Chavez
      June 2008
    2. Gandhi and Churchill by Arthur Herman
      Mark Falcoff
      June 2008
    3. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians: Annotated Text
      Efraim Karsh
    4. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians—
      The True Story

      Efraim Karsh
      May 2008
    5. Land That I Love
      Joseph I. Lieberman
  1. Obama and Race
    Linda Chavez
    June 2008
  2. Gandhi and Churchill by Arthur Herman
    Mark Falcoff
    June 2008
  3. What Does Reform Judaism Stand For?
    Jack Wertheimer
    June 2008
  4. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians: Annotated Text
    Efraim Karsh
  5. 1948, Israel, and the Palestinians—
    The True Story

    Efraim Karsh
    May 2008

Advertisement

Advertisement

about gabe|gabe's archive|RSS
commentary's blogs: the horizon | contentions | connecting the dots
« Michael Scheuer Watch #5: The Danish Affair, Cont.
Bad Hair Day »

Pernicious Pentagon Software

10.31.2007 - 12:47 PM

Yesterday I wrote about the danger that the Pentagon might inadvertently purchase foreign-produced “malicious” software to run some of its most critical computer systems.

Now comes news that some new Pentagon software—pernicious if not malicious—is to be domestically produced, and on orders from the Pentagon itself.

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has awarded Lockheed Martin a $1.3-million contract to develop something called “the Predicting Stability through Analyzing Germane Events (PRESAGE) system.” Typical events that will be predicted “may include rebellions, insurgencies, ethnic/religious violence, civil war, and major economic crises.”

How will it work?

According to the announcement, PRESAGE will “combine a portfolio of state-of-the-art and operationally deployed social-science models and technologies” that will let “military commanders anticipate and respond to world-wide political crises and predict events of interest and stability of countries of interest with greater than 80-percent accuracy.”

Eighty-percent accuracy? That’s far better than the CIA’s rate of accuracy in predicting  “political events of interest.” And it is far better than Merrill Lynch does in predicting economic ones (Stan O’Neal please call your former office).

Perhaps we should now do as my former boss, the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan, proposed: abolish the spy agency altogether. Moynihan wanted the State Department to take responsibility for gathering intelligence. But it seems we could let computers carry out our intelligence functions instead. 

There is only one small hitch. When it comes to predicting the future, computers are not likely to do a better job than the CIA, or Goldman Sachs, or even Connecting the Dots. I haven’t had a chance to examine the algorithms in PRESAGE, but as Vladimir Ilych Lenin said, when you see a heap of dung in the road, you don’t need to stick your nose in it to know what it is. And I know enough about junk political science to know it when I see it.

Does anyone disagree? The Lockheed team building PRESAGE includes specialists from the University of Pennsylvania, University of Kansas, University of Washington, and University of Georgia. Despite this stellar lineup, I can predict with more than 80-percent accuracy that the program will flop, at a cost of $1.3 million. That money would be far better spent repairing dangerous dams built by Saddam Hussein.

»Back to Connecting the Dots »Back to Commentary

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Google Google
Facebook Facebook
Email This Post Print This Post Permanent Link To Article


This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 31st, 2007 at 12:47 PM and is filed under Connecting the Dots. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Pernicious Pentagon Software”

  1. 1
    Shmuel BenYosef Says:
    October 31st, 2007 at 5:05 PM

    Perhaps this can be considered a futher development of the mind reading devices to be built into personal armor to increase mobility.

Leave a Reply

Advertisement

image of latest cover
image of latest cover

FREE SAMPLE ISSUE

  • the complete archive
  • hundreds of authors
  • thousands of articles
  • American history
    since 1945

ENTER THE ARCHIVE

ADVERTISER LINKS

Illustrations by Terry Colon
Secured Loans
Used Cars
Car Loans
Car Finance by Location
Car Finance
Bad Car Credit
Debt Management
Used Cars
Concert Tickets 
Compare Secured Loans
Life Insurance
Boat Hire
Secured Loans



Advertisement


Advertisement

Commentary is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).



Home | Subscribe | About Us | Donate | Advertise | Contact Us | Legal Notices | RSS

Commentar

Copyright © 1997-2008 Commentary Magazine
All Rights Reserved