Commentary Magazine


Topic: Joseph Abrams

RE: The UN Human Rights Circus Plays On

As I noted, Iran made its bid to join the UN Commission on the Status of Women. And Joseph Abrams of Fox News tells us that the mullahs did it — they now get to instruct the international community on the importance of gender equality. But it seems as though the UN didn’t want to advertise this exciting new addition to their august body:

Buried 2,000 words deep in a U.N. press release distributed Wednesday on the filling of “vacancies in subsidiary bodies,” was the stark announcement: Iran, along with representatives from 10 other nations, was “elected by acclamation,” meaning that no open vote was requested or required by any member states — including the United States.

The U.S. couldn’t muster a word of opposition — not even call for a vote. That would be because . . . why? Because our policy is not to confront and challenge the brutal regime for which rape and discrimination are institutionalized policies. No, rather, we are in the business of trying to ingratiate ourselves, and making the U.S. as inoffensive as possible to the world’s thugocracies. We’d no sooner object to Iran on the UN Commission on the Status of Women than we would leave the UN Council on Human Rights. It is what this administration does and how they envision raising our status in the world. The status of women? Hmm. I suppose with Iran on the commission, we’ll neither be investigating nor documenting the handiwork of Neda Agha-Soltan’s murderers.

As I noted, Iran made its bid to join the UN Commission on the Status of Women. And Joseph Abrams of Fox News tells us that the mullahs did it — they now get to instruct the international community on the importance of gender equality. But it seems as though the UN didn’t want to advertise this exciting new addition to their august body:

Buried 2,000 words deep in a U.N. press release distributed Wednesday on the filling of “vacancies in subsidiary bodies,” was the stark announcement: Iran, along with representatives from 10 other nations, was “elected by acclamation,” meaning that no open vote was requested or required by any member states — including the United States.

The U.S. couldn’t muster a word of opposition — not even call for a vote. That would be because . . . why? Because our policy is not to confront and challenge the brutal regime for which rape and discrimination are institutionalized policies. No, rather, we are in the business of trying to ingratiate ourselves, and making the U.S. as inoffensive as possible to the world’s thugocracies. We’d no sooner object to Iran on the UN Commission on the Status of Women than we would leave the UN Council on Human Rights. It is what this administration does and how they envision raising our status in the world. The status of women? Hmm. I suppose with Iran on the commission, we’ll neither be investigating nor documenting the handiwork of Neda Agha-Soltan’s murderers.

Read Less

No Stupid Bureaucrat Left Behind (Updated)

Joseph Abrams of Fox News – the most vilified and trusted news outlet in America — brings to light another episode in the annals of school bureaucrat inanity. He begins: “A California school district has added a new book to the controversial list of literature that is considered unfit for young eyes. It’s the dictionary.” What?! Yup. The offending entry, according to the geniuses entrusted to leave no child behind, comes in the “o’s”:

The trouble started when an inquisitive student got lost somewhere between “oralism” and “orang” and found a rather recent entry to the lexicon: “oral sex,” a phrase that has been in common parlance since 1973 but still makes many parents fairly hot under the collar.

A parent complained, and the bureaucracy lumbered into action to investigate the matter. But never fear, Abrams reports, there is a cumbersome committee on the way to resolve the matter: “a committee of principals, teachers and parents to pore over the book and determine whether it’s fit for young eyes. It could take a while: the unabridged edition available online contains over 470,000 entries.” First Amendment groups are rallying on the other side. The executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition says “If a public school were to remove every book because it contains one word deemed objectionable to some parent, then there would be no books at all in our public libraries. … I think common sense seems to be lacking in this school.” They’ll sort it out sooner or later. Abrams cracks, “One option they’re not likely to consider is Merriam-Webster’s interactive Visual Dictionary, which opens up for children a ‘visual world of information,’ and who knows how many more cans of worms?”

I wonder how much this is costing, by the way. The staff time, the alternative set of books, the mailings to the parents, and probably some lawyers on retainer — it all adds up. The liberal education establishment would have us believe our schools are suffering from lack of funds. Well, we’re spending more on schools than ever before and not getting much for our money. Perhaps the problem isn’t just (or even) money. It seems there is also, as the man said, a shortage of common sense, and a lot of people who are spending their time not teaching.

UPDATE: It seems that the school district dictionary police have retreated. Abrams’s follow-up report tells us:

California school district was embarrassed after it tried to ban America’s classic dictionary from 4th- and 5th-grade classrooms because it worried the book contained “age-inappropriate” words. After conducting an investigation of the very wordy book, Menifee Union School District has reversed its decision and invited Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary back into bookcases at Oak Meadows Elementary School.

School administrators can now presumably return to their usual activities (e.g., confiscating cold medication, running “sensitivity” workshops, and running recycling programs).

Joseph Abrams of Fox News – the most vilified and trusted news outlet in America — brings to light another episode in the annals of school bureaucrat inanity. He begins: “A California school district has added a new book to the controversial list of literature that is considered unfit for young eyes. It’s the dictionary.” What?! Yup. The offending entry, according to the geniuses entrusted to leave no child behind, comes in the “o’s”:

The trouble started when an inquisitive student got lost somewhere between “oralism” and “orang” and found a rather recent entry to the lexicon: “oral sex,” a phrase that has been in common parlance since 1973 but still makes many parents fairly hot under the collar.

A parent complained, and the bureaucracy lumbered into action to investigate the matter. But never fear, Abrams reports, there is a cumbersome committee on the way to resolve the matter: “a committee of principals, teachers and parents to pore over the book and determine whether it’s fit for young eyes. It could take a while: the unabridged edition available online contains over 470,000 entries.” First Amendment groups are rallying on the other side. The executive director of the California First Amendment Coalition says “If a public school were to remove every book because it contains one word deemed objectionable to some parent, then there would be no books at all in our public libraries. … I think common sense seems to be lacking in this school.” They’ll sort it out sooner or later. Abrams cracks, “One option they’re not likely to consider is Merriam-Webster’s interactive Visual Dictionary, which opens up for children a ‘visual world of information,’ and who knows how many more cans of worms?”

I wonder how much this is costing, by the way. The staff time, the alternative set of books, the mailings to the parents, and probably some lawyers on retainer — it all adds up. The liberal education establishment would have us believe our schools are suffering from lack of funds. Well, we’re spending more on schools than ever before and not getting much for our money. Perhaps the problem isn’t just (or even) money. It seems there is also, as the man said, a shortage of common sense, and a lot of people who are spending their time not teaching.

UPDATE: It seems that the school district dictionary police have retreated. Abrams’s follow-up report tells us:

California school district was embarrassed after it tried to ban America’s classic dictionary from 4th- and 5th-grade classrooms because it worried the book contained “age-inappropriate” words. After conducting an investigation of the very wordy book, Menifee Union School District has reversed its decision and invited Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary back into bookcases at Oak Meadows Elementary School.

School administrators can now presumably return to their usual activities (e.g., confiscating cold medication, running “sensitivity” workshops, and running recycling programs).

Read Less




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.