Natan Sharansky was in town yesterday and dropped by the offices of COMMENTARY– where I challenged him to a game of chess, thereby fulfilling a decades’ long dream. The trouble was, we did not have a chess set handy, which led him to remark that this meant that COMMENTARY was not a Jewish magazine. One of my colleagues ran out to the wonderful stationery store, Sam Flax, which agreed on the spot to sponsor the match and provided us with an odd but perfectly usable set.
During long years as a Soviet refusenik, and then a decade in the Gulag on the trumped-up crime of treason, Sharansky had a lot of time to ponder the fine points of the royal game. As the New York Times reported, “he had little time for chess during his dissident years in the Soviet Union, but he recovered his skills in prison, where he said he spent the long days in solitary confinement playing three simultaneous games in his mind.” Sharansky told the newspaper, “I played thousands of games, and I won them all.”
In Russia, he had earned the title of candidate master, which is equivalent to the rank of American master. The latter is the title I earned in 1989, the last year in which I played a game of competitive chess. Sharansky has played twice against the former world champion Garry Kasparov, emerging with one draw and one victory, an excellent score for an amateur even considering that both games took place at exhibitions in which Kasparov was playing multiple players simultaneously.
Lately, however, Sharansky has devoted most of his time to preventing the state of Israel from (to use chess lingo) sacrificing its pieces without adequate compensation. And so his chess, though strong, may not be as strong as it once was. When we sat down to play, I had little idea what I would be up against.
In our first game, playing black, Sharansky responded to 1.e4 with the ultra-aggressive Schliemann Defense in the Ruy Lopez. Unfortunately, I fell into a trap and the game was over in a mere seven moves, a humiliation for Connecting the Dots akin to the Arab defeat in the Six-Day war, and one that cried out for another round.
In our second game, I had the black pieces. I steered into one of my favorite lines of the rock-solid Caro-Kann. Before too long, I was able to exchange off some of Sharansky’s most actively placed pieces and then I managed to win one of his central pawns, obtaining a very strong position. On his 24th move, Sharansky made a blunder and gave up a second pawn. The game was now all but won.
But my opponent proved to be nothing if not resourceful, and unfortunately, through inaccurate play, I helped him along. As I pushed my pawns forward he managed to maneuver his rooks onto the seventh rank, whereupon I agreed (prematurely, it turns out) to a draw. At a score of 1/2 to 1 1/2, I ended up with the same result against Sharansky that Garry Kasparov had obtained against him, a score that left me immensely satisfied that I had been able to lay a finger on this remarkable Russian, Israeli, Jewish hero.
GAME 1
Schoenfeld vs. Sharansky
Ruy Lopez
1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 Nc6
3.Bb5 f5
4.Bxc6 dxc6
5.Nxe5 fxe4
6.Nc3 Nf6
7.0–0??
POSITION AFTER 7.0-0??
White walks right into a trap and the game is over. I should have resigned immediately after Sharanksy’s next move, but was too stunned by the sudden turn of events.
7… Qd4
8.Re1 Qxe5
9.Nxe4 Nxe4
10.d3 Bf5
11.dxe4 Bg6
and realizing, belatedly, that I was lost, I resigned.
0–1
GAME 2
Sharansky vs. Schoenfeld
Caro-Kann
1.e4 c6
2.d4 d5
3.Nc3 dxe4
4.Nxe4 Nd7
5.Nf3 Ngf6
6.Ng3 e6
7.Bd3 Bd6
8.0–0 Qc7
9.c4 0–0
10.c5 Be7
11.Re1 b6
12.b4 a5
13.cxb6 Qxb6
14.bxa5 Rxa5
15.Bd2 Ra8
16.Qc2 Ba6
17.Bxa6 Qxa6
18.Ne5 c5
19.Nxd7 Nxd7
20.d5?
Akin to pulling out of Gaza. This gives up a pawn without compensation.
20… Bf6
21.Bc3
If 21.dxe6 Bxa1 22.exd7 Qxa2 23.Qxa2 Rxa2 24.Bg5 f6 25.Bf4 Be5 26.Bxe5 fxe5 27.Rxe5 Ra1+ 28.Nf1 Rd1 and white is up the exchange for a pawn in a winning endgame.
21… Qc4
22.Rec1 Qxc3
23.Qxc3 Bxc3
24.Rxc3 exd5
Black’s imposing central pawns give him a powerful advantage.
25.Nf5 Rfe8
26.a4??
Sharansky is momentarily distracted and drops a pawn after I explain to him that at Annapolis Olmert has just yielded the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem in exchange for the right to shake hands with the Saudi deputy foreign minister.
26… Rxa4
27.Rd1 d4
28.Rf3 Ne5
29.Rg3 g6
30.Nd6 Re6
31.Ne4 Rc6
32.f4 Nc4
33.Ng5 f5?
Unnecessary. Better to proceed simply with the attack via 33. Ne3.
34.Nf3 Ne3
35.Rc1 d3
36.Nd2 Ra2
37.Rxe3 Rxd2
38.Re7 Rc2?
Never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity, I make the worst move on the board, giving white a draw. Far better is 38…Rb6 39.Ra1 Rb8 40.h3 Re2, and black runs out of threats.
39.Ra1 Rc8
40.Raa7 Re2
41.Rg7+ Kf8
42.Raf7+ Ke8
43.Rd7??
POSITION AFTER 43. Rd7??
A disastrous comedy of errors. Sharansky would have had a simple draw by repetition after 43.Rb7. But my own play is even worse since I now offer a draw in a won position. 43…d2! wins.
1/2-1/2
Schoenfeld vs. Sharansky
Natan Sharansky was in town yesterday and dropped by the offices of COMMENTARY– where I challenged him to a game of chess, thereby fulfilling a decades’ long dream. The trouble was, we did not have a chess set handy, which led him to remark that this meant that COMMENTARY was not a Jewish magazine. One of my colleagues ran out to the wonderful stationery store, Sam Flax, which agreed on the spot to sponsor the match and provided us with an odd but perfectly usable set.
During long years as a Soviet refusenik, and then a decade in the Gulag on the trumped-up crime of treason, Sharansky had a lot of time to ponder the fine points of the royal game. As the New York Times reported, “he had little time for chess during his dissident years in the Soviet Union, but he recovered his skills in prison, where he said he spent the long days in solitary confinement playing three simultaneous games in his mind.” Sharansky told the newspaper, “I played thousands of games, and I won them all.”
In Russia, he had earned the title of candidate master, which is equivalent to the rank of American master. The latter is the title I earned in 1989, the last year in which I played a game of competitive chess. Sharansky has played twice against the former world champion Garry Kasparov, emerging with one draw and one victory, an excellent score for an amateur even considering that both games took place at exhibitions in which Kasparov was playing multiple players simultaneously.
Lately, however, Sharansky has devoted most of his time to preventing the state of Israel from (to use chess lingo) sacrificing its pieces without adequate compensation. And so his chess, though strong, may not be as strong as it once was. When we sat down to play, I had little idea what I would be up against.
In our first game, playing black, Sharansky responded to 1.e4 with the ultra-aggressive Schliemann Defense in the Ruy Lopez. Unfortunately, I fell into a trap and the game was over in a mere seven moves, a humiliation for Connecting the Dots akin to the Arab defeat in the Six-Day war, and one that cried out for another round.
In our second game, I had the black pieces. I steered into one of my favorite lines of the rock-solid Caro-Kann. Before too long, I was able to exchange off some of Sharansky’s most actively placed pieces and then I managed to win one of his central pawns, obtaining a very strong position. On his 24th move, Sharansky made a blunder and gave up a second pawn. The game was now all but won.
But my opponent proved to be nothing if not resourceful, and unfortunately, through inaccurate play, I helped him along. As I pushed my pawns forward he managed to maneuver his rooks onto the seventh rank, whereupon I agreed (prematurely, it turns out) to a draw. At a score of 1/2 to 1 1/2, I ended up with the same result against Sharansky that Garry Kasparov had obtained against him, a score that left me immensely satisfied that I had been able to lay a finger on this remarkable Russian, Israeli, Jewish hero.
GAME 1
Schoenfeld vs. Sharansky
Ruy Lopez
1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 Nc6
3.Bb5 f5
4.Bxc6 dxc6
5.Nxe5 fxe4
6.Nc3 Nf6
7.0–0??
POSITION AFTER 7.0-0??
White walks right into a trap and the game is over. I should have resigned immediately after Sharanksy’s next move, but was too stunned by the sudden turn of events.
7… Qd4
8.Re1 Qxe5
9.Nxe4 Nxe4
10.d3 Bf5
11.dxe4 Bg6
and realizing, belatedly, that I was lost, I resigned.
0–1
GAME 2
Sharansky vs. Schoenfeld
Caro-Kann
1.e4 c6
2.d4 d5
3.Nc3 dxe4
4.Nxe4 Nd7
5.Nf3 Ngf6
6.Ng3 e6
7.Bd3 Bd6
8.0–0 Qc7
9.c4 0–0
10.c5 Be7
11.Re1 b6
12.b4 a5
13.cxb6 Qxb6
14.bxa5 Rxa5
15.Bd2 Ra8
16.Qc2 Ba6
17.Bxa6 Qxa6
18.Ne5 c5
19.Nxd7 Nxd7
20.d5?
Akin to pulling out of Gaza. This gives up a pawn without compensation.
20… Bf6
21.Bc3
If 21.dxe6 Bxa1 22.exd7 Qxa2 23.Qxa2 Rxa2 24.Bg5 f6 25.Bf4 Be5 26.Bxe5 fxe5 27.Rxe5 Ra1+ 28.Nf1 Rd1 and white is up the exchange for a pawn in a winning endgame.
21… Qc4
22.Rec1 Qxc3
23.Qxc3 Bxc3
24.Rxc3 exd5
Black’s imposing central pawns give him a powerful advantage.
25.Nf5 Rfe8
26.a4??
Sharansky is momentarily distracted and drops a pawn after I explain to him that at Annapolis Olmert has just yielded the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem in exchange for the right to shake hands with the Saudi deputy foreign minister.
26… Rxa4
27.Rd1 d4
28.Rf3 Ne5
29.Rg3 g6
30.Nd6 Re6
31.Ne4 Rc6
32.f4 Nc4
33.Ng5 f5?
Unnecessary. Better to proceed simply with the attack via 33. Ne3.
34.Nf3 Ne3
35.Rc1 d3
36.Nd2 Ra2
37.Rxe3 Rxd2
38.Re7 Rc2?
Never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity, I make the worst move on the board, giving white a draw. Far better is 38…Rb6 39.Ra1 Rb8 40.h3 Re2, and black runs out of threats.
39.Ra1 Rc8
40.Raa7 Re2
41.Rg7+ Kf8
42.Raf7+ Ke8
43.Rd7??
POSITION AFTER 43. Rd7??
A disastrous comedy of errors. Sharansky would have had a simple draw by repetition after 43.Rb7. But my own play is even worse since I now offer a draw in a won position. 43…d2! wins.
1/2-1/2