Commentary Magazine


Topic: sufficient tools

RE: Personal Popularity ≠ Effectiveness

Max, you put your finger on one, but not the only, flaw in Obama’s worldview. He believes his own presence and words are sufficient tools of national security. He further imagines that his aura will be enough to trump national self-interests and fundamental conflicts between the West and our foes.

Obama and his spinners remain convinced that the Cairo speech was a seminal moment, a turning point, and a triumph. Why do they think this? What evidence is there that this affected the “peace process” (except negatively)? It is scant. Obama imagines that ingratiating himself with the Chinese would draw them to our side on sanctions against Iran. It’s done nothing of the kind. He’s “reset” our relations with Russia, again by ingratiation, and again without results.

There is in all this, and in nearly every other aspect of Obama’s foreign policy, a tendency to exaggerate his own importance, soft-pedal “hard power” (the exception being his largely cogent, if much delayed, Afghanistan policy), and diminish the very real factors at the root of conflicts. Some might call that foolhardy or naive. Others might call it narcissism or egocentrism. Whatever the definition, it’s largely not working.

Max, you put your finger on one, but not the only, flaw in Obama’s worldview. He believes his own presence and words are sufficient tools of national security. He further imagines that his aura will be enough to trump national self-interests and fundamental conflicts between the West and our foes.

Obama and his spinners remain convinced that the Cairo speech was a seminal moment, a turning point, and a triumph. Why do they think this? What evidence is there that this affected the “peace process” (except negatively)? It is scant. Obama imagines that ingratiating himself with the Chinese would draw them to our side on sanctions against Iran. It’s done nothing of the kind. He’s “reset” our relations with Russia, again by ingratiation, and again without results.

There is in all this, and in nearly every other aspect of Obama’s foreign policy, a tendency to exaggerate his own importance, soft-pedal “hard power” (the exception being his largely cogent, if much delayed, Afghanistan policy), and diminish the very real factors at the root of conflicts. Some might call that foolhardy or naive. Others might call it narcissism or egocentrism. Whatever the definition, it’s largely not working.

Read Less




Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.