xTooltipElement
    1. Obama's Enemies List
      Peter Wehner
    2. Islamist Extremism and the Murder of Daniel Pearl
      Joseph I. Lieberman
    3. Why Obama Is Wrong on Missile Defense
      Steven Price
    4. How Politics Destroyed a Great TV Show
      Jonah Goldberg
      October 2009
    5. Why Are Jews Liberals?—A Symposium
      David Wolpe, Jonathan D. Sarna, Michael Medved, William Kristol and Jeff Jacoby
      September 2009

Advertisement



September 1972

E-mail Article Reserve Article Download PDF Version
Yes, I would like to receive periodic updates and information via e-mail from Commentary.

Thank You

A link to

"Needing Niebuhr Again"

has been emailed to your friends.

Most E-mailed articles:

Abstract –

IS IT only a year since Reinhold Niebuhr died? It seems like ten. His strong but broken body had not yet surrendered when "new historical situations" were being proclaimed and his work discounted as a period piece. Niebuhr's "Christian realism," Tom Driver said, "was essentially defensive or conservative."

Not long ago, Niebuhr towered over Christian political thinkers in the land. Now the new Movement-of moralism, hope, vision, and radical analysis-appears to have tumbled that once lofty tower or, far more sadly, to have wandered past it into a desert.

Undoubtedly, the structure of Niebuhr's thought must be enlarged, redirected, given a deeper and more accurate base. Yet it will be enough, in celebration of his memory, to apply the basic insights of his thought to those who so easily think to replace him. The new moralism we see all around us is all too like the old moralism, against which Niebuhr directed the central energies of his life. In many ways it is as if he had lived and worked in vain.


About the Author

Michael Novak is professor of philosophy and religious studies at the State University of New York at Old West-bury and the author of, among other works, The Rise of the Unmeltable Ethnics, The Experience of Nothingness, and Belief and Unbelief.