Has the surge already failed? That’s the impression you get from the MSM. The reality on the ground is a little different. Although the last surge troops only arrived in June, they have already had a significant impact. How significant? In preparing to testify before a congressional committee tomorrow, I put that question to a friend of mine, an American officer serving in Baghdad. Here is his response, which he agreed to let me share with contentions, provided that I did not use his name (I’ve added explanations of a few acronyms):
Here are some positive results of the surge strategy to date—I’m sure you’ve got the negatives down pat from all the media reports.
– Deaths caused by sectarian violence in Iraq are down 75 percent from January to June
– VBIED’s [vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices]/Suicide attacks cut in half from March to June; VBIED’s at lowest level since August 2006
– Casualties from VBIED’s cut in half from February to June
– Attacks in Al Anbar cut by 80 percent since February
– ISF KIA [Iraqi Security Forces killed-in-action] at 2-3 times the level of Coalition KIA—Iraqis are fighting and dying for their country
– Tribes are rejecting Al Qaeda in Al Anbar, Salah Ad Din, Ninewa, Diyala
– AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] is on the defensive and slowly dying—BUT WE NEED TIME TO FINISH THE JOB or they will recover
– Government of Iraq is rejecting militias and authorizing strikes anywhere in Iraq
– Government of Iraq responded well to second Samarra Mosque bombing
– Government of Iraq has formed a Reconciliation Committee to engage local groups and bring them into the process against Al Qaeda and in support of the GoI
– Government of Iraq improving budget execution
The big negative, of course, is lack of political reconciliation at the national level, but this is a lagging indicator. Progress is being made at the local level, and I believe the national leaders will follow in due course once the trend is clear.
Best from Baghdad,