Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Freeman: “To Be Continued”

Like the old joke, “Franco is still dead,” the New York Times is still mum on the Chas Freeman nomination. Aside from an automated response, Clark Hoyt, the public editor previously charged with explaining why the Times didn’t report for weeks on the Reverend Wright story, hasn’t responded to my inquiry as to why the Times remains mute.

However, the rest of the journalistic and political world is not cooperating with the Times‘ apparent desire to shove this issue under the rug. The pro-Freeman forces have taken to arguing that his egregious comments, on Tienanmen Square for example, have been taken out of context. Not so. He also assembled on odd grab bag of weird characters to “endorse” him. Probably not a sound move if you are trying to convince people you are not a questionable character yourself.

Then Ira Forman, head of the National Jewish Democratic Council, weighs in, taking the pro-Freeman forces to task for playing the “patriot” card against Freeman’s critics. Forman can’t quite bring himself to call them out for perpetuating a virulent anti-Semitic canard or ignoring the legion of objections against Freeman from diverse groups including Chinese dissidents, but at least his heart is in the right place.

Then earlier today we had a hearing of the Senate Armed Service Committee. Sen. Joe Lieberman raised the Freeman nomination and cited some of the concerns which had been raised. Again Admiral Dennis Blair played the “taken out of context” card, which Lieberman was not buying. (Curious, isn’t it, that Blair and the left-wing net-roots are operating from the same script?) Lieberman ended his questioning by advising Blair that the concern was over Freeman having “such strong policy views” that he might not be suited for an analyst role. He told Blair the controversy was not likely “to go away.” Lieberman called the controversial comments by Freeman “very decisive” and ended with the words “to be continued.”

Indeed it will — everywhere except on the pages of the New York Times.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.