Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Re: More on Yoo and Bybee

In response to the news of Yoo and Bybee’s exoneration and of the shoddiness of the Justice Department’s investigation, a smart reader writes to me, “As for the Holder Justice Department, it’s a perfect reflection of the Obama White House.” I think this is precisely right and important to keep in mind.

There is a tendency in reporting and punditry, fostered by the Obama spin machine, to treat Eric Holder as an independent agent, and his Department’s ill-advised policy decisions as larks, discrete from and unrelated to the Obami’s agenda. But this is wrong. First, none of the policy calls or the investigations, including the Yoo/Bybee witch hunt, were at odds with Obama’s own views and public utterances. It is not as if the Justice Department came up with the idea of closing Guantanamo, treating terrorists as ordinary criminals, or engaging in a vendetta against the Bush administration. These ideas were all part of Obama’s campaign rhetoric and his professed agenda from the earliest days of his administration. So rather than a rogue Justice Department, we have one that facilitates and enables the Obami’s worst instincts.

But the Yoo/Bybee investigation is illustrative of the Obama White House in other ways: the hyper-partisanship, the disregard for facts and careful analysis, the tendency to ignore critics and blindly follow a predetermined course of action, and the need to make an embarrassing about-face when it all comes crumbling down. That’s what happened in the OPR investigation and what we’ve seen in many other contexts as well — from Iran policy to health-care reform. Hillary Clinton’s “ideology is so yesterday” statement was meant as a slur on the Bush administration. But it is Obama and also his intensely politicized Justice Department who are blinded by ideology and, frankly, by a fixation on repudiating Obama’s predecessor. These things never end well, as we saw with the OPR investigation, for those caught in the snare of revenge.

The Democrats want a hearing on the Yoo/Bybee investigation? I say, bring it on! A full discussion and exploration of all of this and more would be enlightening.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.