Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Strauss-Kahn and the Difference between America and France

Anyone who travelled in Europe in the waning years of the Clinton presidency can recall the general incredulity on the other side of the pond about the puritanical American obsession with sex. The very idea that we would impeach our president because he lied about sex (albeit, under oath) astonished Europeans, none more so than the sophisticated French. Everyone knew their leaders had girlfriends on the side, but no one professed to care about it much—not even political wives.

But the arrest yesterday of International Monetary Fund managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn on charges of rape has la belle France’s political class answering some difficult questions. After all, Strauss-Kahn is not just another European Union bureaucrat. Until the NYPD’s Special Victims Unit (the real thing, not Christopher Meloni and Mariska Hargitay) pulled him out of the first class section of an Air France jet moments before it was about to take off, Strauss-Kahn was the French Socialist Party’s leading contender for next year’s presidential election. Can you imagine the guffaws that would be echoing around Europe if this happened to any of the leading Republican presidential candidates? Helas, Barack Obama will not be as lucky as Nicholas Sarkozy.

Strauss-Kahn is innocent until proven guilty. But the specific questions about this case aside, the really important issue here is how a person who was, according to today’s New York Times, well known to be a sexual predator with a history of attempted rape, allowed to rise in French politics without anyone’s blowing the whistle. It turns out all that French sophistication about sex was nothing more than the old boy network protecting its own, providing cover to a rapist while expressing disgust for puritanical Americans.

A dozen years ago, highbrow Europeans called upon Americans to do some soul-searching about the way they had let the search for Bill Clinton’s indiscretions convulse the political system. But flawed and as hypocritical as that process was (yes, I’m talking about you, Newt Gingrich), I would far rather live in a country that takes illicit sex as seriously as the United States than in one where a man like Dominique Strauss-Kahn can be considered presidential timber—at least, that is, until he discovered that there are things that you can get away with in France that you have to answer for in the puritanical States.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.