Commentary Magazine


Contentions

White House Bans Boston Herald from Fundraiser

Late last month, the White House banished a San Francisco Chronicle reporter from pool coverage for the “infraction” of filming a group of activists protesting an Obama fundraiser. But the administration’s heavy-handedness with reporters reached a new level today. A Boston Herald writer has reportedly been kicked out of the pool coverage for an Obama fundraiser, because the White House feels the newspaper is too conservative. The Herald itself broke the story:

The White House Press Office has refused to give the Boston Herald full access to President Obama’s Boston fund-raiser today, in e-mails objecting to the newspaper’s front page placement of a Mitt Romney op-ed, saying pool reporters are chosen based on whether they cover the news “fairly.”

The White House was clueless enough to email its complaints to the Herald , which promptly printed them on today’s front page.

“I tend to consider the degree to which papers have demonstrated to covering the White House regularly and fairly in determining local pool reporters,” White House spokesman Matt Lehrich wrote in response to the Herald’s request for access to the president’s fundraiser. Lehrich claimed that the Herald was biased because it recently ran an op-ed about Mitt Romney on its front page, instead of giving more attention to Obama’s Boston visit.

“My point about the op-ed was not that you ran it but that it was the full front page, which excluded any coverage of the visit of a sitting US President to Boston. I think that raises a fair question about whether the paper is unbiased in its coverage of the President’s visits,” Lehrich wrote.

Apparently the White House isn’t aware that publishing editorials on the front page is a long-standing tradition in tabloid journalism. And apparently it believes that it has the power to tell newspapers what they can and can’t be printing. The White House’s media bullying is becoming a pattern, and it’s one that could begin having a chilling effect on coverage. News organizations need to start speaking out about his, because any one of them could become the next victim.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »





Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.