There is no doubt that the African rebel leader Joseph Kony is a very bad man who–as viewers of the viral hit movie Kony 2012 know–deserves to be brought to justice. But is his capture important enough to justify a growing commitment of U.S. Special Operations Forces to Uganda?
President Obama has just announced that he is roughly doubling the size of the U.S. Special Operations Force on this mission to 300 personnel and sending an Osprey aircraft along with refueling aircraft.
If defense funds and the resources of the U.S. Special Operations Command were unlimited, I would say go for it. But that is not the case. As we know, defense spending is being slashed even as demands on the entire force–and especially on SOCOM–are growing. In fact there is “significant stress” on the Special Operations community, which is called on not only to fight in Afghanistan and in the global war on terror but also to conduct anti-piracy missions (remember who freed Captain Philips?) and myriad other assignments.
Some missions–such as standing up security forces in Libya capable of ending the rule of militias and restoring some law and order, or training non-jihadist rebels in Syria capable of beating back both Hezbollah and al-Qaeda–are getting short shrift as a result. To say nothing of preparing for a Russian invasion of Ukraine, Moldova, or other states: that is a potential emergency for which the U.S. military, in the full throes of budget cuts, are simply not prepared for.
It is hard to see, therefore, how the White House can justify the commitment of scarce resources to a mission that does not implicate any vital American interest and that can best be described as humanitarian. There is, of course, nothing wrong with sending the U.S. military on humanitarian missions, but only if it does not take away from vital work elsewhere. I fear that in the case of Kony we are committing resources that are needed elsewhere.