Commentary Magazine


Iran Demands U.S. Withdrawal from Gulf

To mark the 30th anniversary of the Iranian seizure of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei gave a blistering speech mocking President Barack Obama and warning the U.S. president that he would see no settlement with Iran so long as the United States maintained a military presence in the Persian Gulf or placed his hopes in Iranian reformers.

He began:

“This new President of America said beautiful things. He sent us messages constantly, both orally and written: ‘Come and let us turn the page, come and create a new situation, come and let us cooperate in solving the problems of the world.’ It reached this degree! We said that we should not be prejudiced, that we will look at their deeds. They said we want change. We said, well, let us see the change.

And, then, he referred to a speech he gave on the Iranian New year (March 21, 2009) in Mashhad responding to Obama’s televised interviews and letters. The White House and the State Department speech ignored that speech, at least publicly, because it wasn’t what they wanted to hear, but here’s how Khamenei referred to it:

I said that if there is an iron fist under the velvet glove and you extend a hand towards us we will not extend our hand. This was the warning I made eight months ago. During the past eight months, what we have seen is contrary to what they orally express and pretend…

What does Khamenei mean by the “iron fist”? It’s the U.S. navy and the presence of U.S. ships in international waters in and around the Persian Gulf.

He concluded by declaring:

They should not rest their hopes in the unrest which happened after the [2009] election… [Reformists] can’t roll out the red carpet for the United States in our country. They should know this. The Iranian nation resists.

The irony here is that the logic of Obama’s strategy is to cultivate the reformists somehow believing that they can triumph and marginalize the hardliners, never mind that men like Iranian President Hassan Rouhani are hard line, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps dominates the military and economy, and the Supreme Leader is supreme, no matter how Obama might like to twist it.

Fast forward more than five years. Earlier today, Khamenei warned that he would not tolerate any threats overshadowing negotiations:

I do not agree with negotiations that are shadowed by threats. The Iranian nation does not tolerate negotiations under threat… The negotiators should carry on with the negotiations while observing the red lines. However, they should not welcome any imposition, humiliation and threats.

America’s Gulf allies already hear in Obama’s rhetoric of a “pivot to Asia” shadows of British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan’s “East of Suez” speech. They fear abandonment. It is a fear that the Iranian government stokes in word and action.

There has not been a single Iranian objection to which Obama and Kerry have not caved. They do not seem to understand that what they see as compromise Khamenei sees as weakness to exploit. As Khamenei increasingly alludes to a refusal to negotiate “under threat,” and makes other allusions to U.S. power projection in the region, the question is whether Obama will once again acquiesce and effectively cede security in the Persian Gulf to Iran. He may say no, but his pattern of actions speaks louder than words. America’s Gulf allies should be very worried indeed.

Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »

2 Responses to “Iran Demands U.S. Withdrawal from Gulf”


    The underlying issue is that BHO has a view of world affairs that is highly aligned with Khameini’s. BHO judges that a very high proportion of present US foreign policy issues (read: debacles) are the direct consequence of past US military actions–that countries such as Iran would have more normal relations with the US if it weren’t for our past and ongoing military oppression around the world.
    BHO’s solution is to to refrain from military action (except de minimus military PR activities) for as long a time as necessary until nations such as Iran, North Korea, Cuba et. al. are convinced the US is sincere in refraining from the use of military force, no matter how warranted.
    When the US now does refrain from military force when warranted (Syria’s use of chemical weapons), Iran is not the least convinced of BHO’s sincerity. Amazingly this continued Iranian belligerency reinforces BHO’s belief that he has correctly assessed the situation, and that as a result more US restraint is indicated.
    It’s a perfect demonstration of the danger of ideology trumping empirical observation.


    It seems fanciful to ascribe more theory and geopolitical spin to explain what Obama is doing, or paint the scene as if there might be better motives behind the tilt toward complete submission to Iranian aims than as the fiasco it promises to engender.

    Clifford May’s recent description of an Obama strategy pitting Shia jihadists against Sunni jihadists via the Iran deal, and Mr. Rubin’s ‘cultivating reformists’ conjecture are both understandable as civil attempts to discuss and fathom what is strange behavior that is obviously inimical to this country’s interests.

    The candidate and President who could speak about his Obamacare as if it were believable to work as the words implied even as he knew what he was saying was not true, is the same candidate and President who assured allies and Americans that Iran would not get a bomb on his watch while seeking contact with Tehran for a grand bargain since 2008/2009.

    There is no structure to what the President is doing, anodyne to theorists and commentators, that is not about heaving up and discarding the historical post-WWII foreign policy of America.

    Except for the parts that require our martial weakness, empowering our enemies and endangering our allies…, as creative destruction goes, it’s about as good as it gets.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
for full access to
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
Don't have a log in?
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.