Commentary Magazine


Contentions

Vatican Recognition of Palestine Won’t Bring Peace Closer

Israel’s critics will celebrate the news today that the Vatican will recognize Palestinian statehood as a rebuke of the Jewish state’s government and policies. The move is line with the international community’s push for Palestinian statehood. It also is part of the Vatican’s efforts to appease the Arab and Muslim worlds as part of a campaign to improve the plight of embattled and dwindling Christian communities in the Middle East. As such, its impact will be mostly symbolic though it will certainly be considered yet another blow to Israel’s uphill efforts to maintain good relations with European countries that are increasingly hostile to Jerusalem. But the one thing we can be sure it won’t do is to improve the chances for peace. By granting the Palestinians official recognition without first requiring them to make peace with Israel, Pope Francis and the Church have only made it less likely that this will ever happen.

It should not be forgotten that the Catholic Church has undergone a remarkable transformation in the last generation with regard to its attitude toward Jews, Judaism and the state of Israel. The historic efforts of Popes John XXIII and John Paul II created a revolution in Jewish-Catholic relations that consigned the disrespect and tolerance for anti-Semitism to the past. The Second Vatican Conference in 1961 broke with the past in terms of rejecting the myth of Jewish responsibility for the death of Jesus and set the Church on the path of reconciliation with Judaism. Pope John Paul II continued that effort and under his tutelage Catholic educational efforts discarded the contempt for Judaism that had formerly characterized the Church’s attitude. He added to that legacy when the Vatican formerly recognized Israel in 1993, putting an end to the Church’s official opposition to Zionism that was rooted in a belief that the Jews were cursed to wander and had forfeited the right to their historic homeland.

Since then relations between the Jewish state and the church have not always been rosy. Disputes that stemmed from the anti-Israel attitudes of Palestinian Christians have continued to pop up. As part of an effort to ingratiate itself with Arab countries, the Church has also adopted policies that were hostile to Israel. It’s effort to wrongly blame the Israelis for the decline in the Palestinian Christian community — a trend that is the result of the growing influence of Islamists — has been particularly egregious. But despite all of that, it would be a mistake to consider the Church or the Vatican a particularly avid foe of Israel. Catholics around the world and especially those in the United States have become some of the Jewish state’s best friends and most staunch allies.

Moreover, it is likely that Pope Francis considers his gesture toward the Palestinians to be one intended to encourage peace. The pontiff seems to consider it an effort to be even-handed between the two parties to the conflict and is probably entirely sincere in his hopes that this move will jumpstart the moribund peace process.

But, for all of his good will, the pope is mistaken to think that giving the Palestinians such recognition will advance the peace process. To the contrary, by granting them official status in this way only encourages Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas to continue to stonewall efforts to make peace.

After all, if Abbas’s real goal been an independent Palestinian state, he could have had one in 2000, 2001 when his former boss Yasir Arafat rejected an Israeli offer of statehood including almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and a share of Jerusalem. Abbas rejected an even better offer in 2008 and then refused to negotiate seriously in 2013 and 2014 even after the Israelis had accepted an American framework whose goal was a two state solution.

The Palestinian campaign to get recognition from the United Nations and other countries is motivated by a desire to avoid peace talks, not to make them more successful. The Palestinians want a state but not one that is prepared to recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state alongside it, not matter where its borders are drawn. By telling the Palestinians, the Church recognizes his faux state; it is making it easier for Abbas to refuse to negotiate. To the extent that this recognition grants the Palestinians rights to all of the disputed 1967 territories, the Vatican and other European states that have done the same thing, is prejudging negotiations that should be conducted by the parties, not outsiders.

Just as important, the Church ignores the fact that an independent Palestinian state in all but name already exists in Gaza under the tyrannical rule of Hamas terrorists. Which “Palestine” is the Church recognizing? Hamasistan or Fatah’s corrupt kleptocracy that Abbas presides over? With Hamas growing more popular, the prospect of it gaining power in an independent West Bank makes an Israeli withdrawal a fantasy rather than a viable policy option.

While no one should question the pope’s good intentions, the Vatican move will only serve to make peace less likely and do nothing for Middle East Christians who are under unbearable pressure from Islamists, not Israel. In this case, being even-handed undermines the already dwindling hopes for a two state solution.



Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »


9 Responses to “Vatican Recognition of Palestine Won’t Bring Peace Closer”

  1. STEVEN BRAITMAN says:

    I do question the pope’s motive in this. He is aware of all the facts as you stated them, and still went ahead with this Israel-bashing move. You’d have to believe that he is hallucinating to believe he sincerely believes this will bring peace.
    Instead, the more clear rationale is that he means to weaken Israel as the Jewish state. Hiss theology is that there cannot be a Jewish state until their man-god “returns”. The pope is “regressing to the mean”-ness of the catholic church in its 1700 year hostility to the Jewish people.
    He should not be accorded any benefit of the doubt; he should be treated as the modern-PR-incarnation of a crypto-Torquemada.

    • MICKEY MOORE says:

      One thing that shouldn’t be questioned with this Pope is his sincerity. From what I have seen, in his attempt to be a peace-maker he approaches conflicts with the assumption that both sides have legitimate grievances. He wants peace and he wants to help the downtrodden. If he knew that this action would result in more death, I don’t believe that he would take it. Catholic theology is indifferent to a Jewish state. He isn’t mean, he just needs better advisors.

  2. STEPHANE S LUBICZ M D says:

    The war of Christianity, the West and the Muslims against the Jews sees no END.

  3. MURRAY ROBINSON says:

    This decision is a disgrace – a foolish and arrogant disgrace… And I’m Catholic.

  4. MANUEL LAZEROV says:

    This would put the Church of the Holy Sepulcure under the control of Muslims. Given the proclivity for Muslim destruction of Christian holy sites, one would think that he’d know better. He’s not buying the Islamists off by any means. To them, this is a reflection of weakness, and will only encourage further outrages.

    This is so reminiscent of the Synod of Orthodox Christians affiliated with the Holy See to blame Israel for their misery, as if throwing us to the dogs will save them, and make them appear as avid and loyal citizens. Soon, nearly all Christians will no longer have a meaningful presence in the Middle East, while in Israel, they have the fastest growing Christian population, and a higher per capita income than Jewish Israelis.In the Palestinian Authority, Christians are nothing.

  5. JAMES WEISBARD says:

    Despite the disingenuous behavior of the Vatican when they say the Jews cannot be blamed or hated for the fate of the Jew Jesus Christ, they continue to preach to their flock how the Jews “killed God”. When fellow Jew haters Hamas provoked Israel into destroying the missile sites, several Roman Catholics spontaneously stated to me the “Jews killed God”. Despite the absolute logical absurdity that human beings could kill the Supreme Being, the Catholics continue to attack the universal scapegoat: Jews in order to deflect attention from the massive scandal of Pedophilic priests

  6. JOHN GLUECK says:

    While Mr. Tobin’s article is justly fair to the Pope and the general initiative for peace between Israel and the Arabs, there is no reason whatever to grant legitimacy to any “Palestinian State.” As all Israeli acts of concession have brought forth nothing but more concessions and terror, it is clear that any “deal’ would be temporary, leading to more terrorism and war. The whole area is becoming more unstable and the nature of the truth about the intentions of the conflicts across Israel’s border in Syria and beyond means that any such state would almost surely become another base for attacking Israel. The Vatican should stand with Christians in Israel and demand an end to the constant campaign of intimidation, theft of property and worse by the PA against them.

  7. KATHLEEN BARNES says:

    im catholic and couldn’t disagree with the pope more. The decision is a disgrace.

  8. STEPHEN LANSET says:

    Native Christians in the Middle East have long tried to propitiate and redirect Muslim hostility by promoting either local nationalisms or pan-Arabism. This is no longer a viable survival strategy. The Christians now get little or no protection in return.




Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
YOU HAVE READ OF 8 FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
FOR JUST
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
YOU HAVE READ 8 OF 8
FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTH.
for full access to
CommentaryMagazine.com
INCLUDES FULL ACCESS TO:
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
CommentaryMagazine.com.
LOG IN WITH YOUR
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE ID
Don't have a CommentaryMagazine.com log in?
CREATE A COMMENTARY
LOG IN ID
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.