Commentary Magazine


How to Defend Israel? Talk About Rights. Not Just Security

Israel diplomats were reportedly shocked this week when their country’s new deputy foreign minister asked them to speak up about Israel’s rights in the conflict with the Palestinians rather than just its security needs. As the Times of Israel reports, Tzipi Hotovely raised more than a few eyebrows when she told a gathering of the country’s diplomatic personnel that it was a mistake to downplay the country’s own territorial claims when seeking to counter complaints about Israel’s presence in the West Bank and Jerusalem. The very idea of quoting the Torah when speaking of ties to the biblical heartland of the Jewish homeland seemed to strike them and left-wing commentators who howled about it later as absurd. Indeed, as the left-wing Haaretz put it, the world may find the minister “hard to swallow.” But while the Likud Knesset member is swimming against the tide of international opinion as well as the culture of the ministry she’s running, she is right. Though many in an international community increasingly influenced by anti-Semitism and misinformation about Israel will never accept such arguments, as the Palestinians have demonstrated over the last generation, talk of rights always trumps security.

Hotovely, whose importance will be heightened by current the lack of a foreign minister (Prime Minister Netanyahu is reserving the post for himself while hoping to give it opposition leader Isaac Herzog should he join the government), is being dismissed as a right-wing extremists for even mentioning Jewish rights, but her critics would do well to heed her advice.

For the last 20 years, Israel’s diplomatic posture about the territories has concentrated on its willingness to make peace. Israel has repeatedly demonstrated its desire to negotiate with the Palestinians and give them a state if they are willing to recognize the legitimacy of a Jewish state next to them. But the Palestinians have repeatedly refused to do that. But they are not generally held accountable for this unreasonable stand because their position is basically that negotiations are unnecessary because Israel has not right to be in any of the lands that it took in the 1967 Six Day War. If the West Bank and Jerusalem are, as the Palestinians claim, stolen property, then they have a point.

But these lands are disputed territory to which both sides can make a legitimate claim. As I wrote in 2012, a report on the legality of Israel’s presence in the territories makes a definitive case that Jews have every right to be there. Asserting that right does not preclude surrendering some or even all of this land in exchange for genuine peace. But as long as the world accepts the fallacious notion that Israel is only there because of fears for its security, few will back it and that assumption undermines Israel’s negotiating position even as it seeks compromise rather than surrender.

Such a stand discomfits most Israeli foreign ministry employees and always has. Standing up for Jewish rights would make them even more unpopular in many of the countries where they serve than they already are. But they should be willing to brave the brickbats that will be thrown at them.

Israel’s case for its presence in the West Bank is based on historical, legal and spiritual factors that cannot be negated by revisionist Arab history of the region or the hate that the Jewish state inspires in its foes. It’s time for all of its representatives to stop trying to avoid the core issues of the conflict and to realize that no one will back Israel because its scientists are brilliant, its high-tech industry is innovative or its beaches are beautiful. The only answer to the apartheid state lies is a counter-argument that is rooted in the same sense of justice that motivates those who sympathize with the Palestinians. Saying Jews have a right to be in the West Bank doesn’t preclude a two-state solution. Not saying so ensures that the world will never seek to force the Palestinians to compromise and make peace.

Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »

5 Responses to “How to Defend Israel? Talk About Rights. Not Just Security”

  1. TIKI SHAPIRA says:

    Simply telling the truth is something ‘not done in politics, especially when it comes to Israel and her legitimate rights.

    Zipy Hotovely is therefore a breath of fresh air telling the (Jew hating) world that what they have been fed by the so called Palestinians and their friends is a BS story based on lies.

  2. ELLIOTT GREEN says:

    Jonathan is right. To illustrate his point, once upon a time, former foreign minister S Peres (also former PM and ex-President) said that hasbarah was not important. It was only important to have a good policy, and such a policy would surely and quickly convince everybody. Well, I have news for that former FM. The world does not work that way.

  3. THOMAS JARVIS says:

    It is well past time for this change of policy, the Arabs long ago learned to twist the language of rights to support the indefensible.


    I’m a long time Commentary buff. I even had a brief (friendly) correspondence with Norman P on the subject of Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait. Which raises my hackles all the more at the suppression of my May 26 comment offered here at 7:11 am. It was sidelined with: “Your comment is awaiting moderation.” It’s still in the waiting room.

    I’ve inquired by e-mail days ago why my on-topic and decently expressed opinion, is being suppressed. No answer.

    Is it so patently ridiculous and dumb, or so insidious and dangerous that it cannot even be spoken? I scratch my head. Are factors involved beyond my keen? Granted, it is your site, you are entitled to exclude what you wish. Any explanation, even one I disagree with, would suffice. But this insulting silence following this arbitrary muzzling, in the wake of the invitation to “Join the discussion, without a hint of a reason, is offensive and disturbing.

    Other sites point violators to governing rules You just give me the finger.


    I don’t understand why the above comment remains: “awaiting moderation” and is not being posted.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
for full access to
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
Don't have a log in?
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.