Commentary Magazine


Losing the Eastern Mediterranean to Russia?

While Greece has been a member of NATO since 1952, anti-Americanism has often run high in Greece. In 1974, Greek leftists assassinated the CIA’s station chief in Athens (after the Institute for Policy Studies, a left-wing think tank still operating in Washington, DC, outed him). During the various conflicts in the former Yugoslavia, popular Greek sentiment often leaned toward the fellow Orthodox communities rather than the Catholic or Muslim communities often supported by NATO members.

Perhaps it’s not surprising, then, that the left-wing government of Alexis Tsipras is openly flirting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. For Putin, foreign policy and diplomacy are zero sum games. Flipping Greece, withdrawing it from NATO or, more dangerously, keeping it in NATO as a consensus-busting Trojan horse at a time when political tension if not conflict looms between Putin’s Russia and many European states and NATO members formerly under Soviet tutelage.

Much of the discussion about losing Greece to Russia, however, overlooks some major issues. The United States has exactly one naval facility in the Eastern Mediterranean, and it is on the Greek island of Crete at Souda Bay. It is not unreasonable that a price Russia would demand in exchange for keeping Greece solvent would be the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Crete. After all, Putin previously used financial leverage to force American forces out of Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan.

Russia has also been putting the moves on Cyprus, which also finds itself in dire financial straits. Earlier this year, for example, Russian officials floated the idea of a base on Cyprus, a move that would enable it to project power more regularly in the region. While the Russian navy withdrew from the Eastern Mediterranean in 1992 in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse, in May 2013, Putin announced a permanent 16-ship Russian Mediterranean task force. A base in Greece or Cyprus would also provide useful backup to the existing Russian base at Tartous, in Syria.

Of course, it’s not simply a matter of grabbing territory wherever it might. The Eastern Mediterranean is becoming increasingly strategic and valuable for energy purposes. Eastern Mediterranean gas is not simply theoretical but is now a fact of life. It also provides the best mechanism, whether through off-shore gas fields or the pipeline terminal in Ceyhan, Turkey, for Europe to bypass the stranglehold Russia has on gas to Europe.

President Obama can talk about a “pivot to Asia,” but increasingly it’s not a simple choice about whether to emphasize defense in the Persian Gulf or Asia: The whole world is in play and adversaries—Russia, China, and Iran—smell the blood of American weakness in the water and prepare to launch a strategic feeding frenzy unseen in half a century, if not more.

Join the discussion…

Are you a subscriber? Log in to comment »

Not a subscriber? Join the discussion today, subscribe to Commentary »

One Response to “Losing the Eastern Mediterranean to Russia?”

  1. ELLIOTT GREEN says:

    Can anybody explain why the eurozone is so stupid and stubborn and seemingly acts against its own interests?

    Instead of working with Greece and Cyprus and Israel in order to rid itself of its dependence for natural gas on Russia, the Eurozone’s policies on the Greek debt crisis/financial crisis/ have done more harm than good. I am not aware of any Eurozone initiative to help Greece develop its offshore oil/gas reserves or to help Cyprus do the same and/or to use those countries for the transit of Israeli natural gas that is already on line. This means that the Eurozone has not helped the Greek economy grow which could have meant that it would need less in the way of loans from external sources to pay off its debts, part of which are the fault of the Eurozone itself [because the first so-called “bailout” of Greece actually ballooned Greek debt because it left Greece to borrow on the open market which everyone should have understood would lead Greece to pay huge interest rates –up to circa 40%]. At the same time the single currency zone did not help Greece grow economically through oil/gas investments for example. Nor did the EU as a whole do so.

    Putin probably does not have the funds to fund all of Greece’s gas/oil development needs or he would probably be doing so already. But if he did have the funds and the Greeks agreed to his terms, then the EU would be cooked because it would be even more dependent on Russian-controlled gas.

    The conclusion is that the Europeans are hopelessly dominated by narrow, bigoted concerns and atavistic prejudices of various sorts, also expressed in the economic domain. We Jews and the state of Israel must never become dependent on these hypocritical and cruelly unwise Europeans.

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This

Share This

Share this post with your friends!

Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor to our site, you are allowed 8 free articles this month.
This is your first of 8 free articles.

If you are already a digital subscriber, log in here »

Print subscriber? For free access to the website and iPad, register here »

To subscribe, click here to see our subscription offers »

Please note this is an advertisement skip this ad
Clearly, you have a passion for ideas.
Subscribe today for unlimited digital access to the publication that shapes the minds of the people who shape our world.
Get for just
Welcome to Commentary Magazine.
We hope you enjoy your visit.
As a visitor, you are allowed 8 free articles.
This is your first article.
You have read of 8 free articles this month.
for full access to
Digital subscriber?
Print subscriber? Get free access »
Call to subscribe: 1-800-829-6270
You can also subscribe
on your computer at
Don't have a log in?
Enter you email address and password below. A confirmation email will be sent to the email address that you provide.