A Terrible Vote

Just five days ago I wrote these words explaining why I was still “bullish on America”:

Although the current crisis exposes vulnerabilities in the American
financial system, it also shows one of our greatest strengths: the ability
of our politicos to cross party lines and formulate a decisive response in
a time of crisis. We saw that kind of bipartisan action after 9/11, and
there is a good chance that we will see it now — assuming that lawmakers
can agree on a bailout package that makes sense.

The august members of the House of Representatives seem determined to prove me wrong. Rather than fall in behind the bipartisan compromise laboriously negotiated over the past week they have chosen to vote it down. I am not an economist or financier, so I have no opinion on the line-by-line merits of the legislation that was just rejected. But it doesn’t take a Nobel Prize winner to see that the financial markets are melting down and that the compromise package was the the best short-term answer available. By voting it down, lawmakers were guilty of contemptible short-sightedness — putting their fear of being criticized for providing a “bailout for the wealthy” ahead of the urgent needs of the country. They have already tanked the stock market for today. Worse may be ahead-and if a serious recession does come it will cost far more than $700 billion and the victims will be the vaunted “middle class” that everyone in Washington professes to care about.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

A Terrible Vote

Must-Reads from Magazine

Iran’s Newest Hostage is Different

An escalation.

On July 16, 2017, Iranian Judiciary spokesman Gholamhosein Mohseni Ejehi announced that Iran had sentenced an American to ten years in prison for alleged espionage. An Iranian judiciary website subsequently identified the American as 37-year-old, China-born Xiyue Wang, a Princeton University Ph.D. student in history.

8
Shares
Google+ Print

Trump’s Naïveté on Display in Syria

The hen house is secured.

Eric Edelman–a former undersecretary of defense in the Bush administration, an aide to Vice President Cheney, and one of the most respected foreign policy hands in Washington–wrote that the July 7 meeting in Hamburg between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin was the most disastrous superpower summit since John F. Kennedy met Nikita Khrushchev in 1961. That Cold War-era summit emboldened the Soviets to put up the Berlin Wall and send missiles to Cuba, thus bringing the world to the brink of nuclear war. It’s a harsh judgment, but its essential accuracy is being confirmed by what we have learned since July 7.

36
Shares
Google+ Print

The ‘Intersectionality’ Trap

No more Sister Souljah moments.

Republicans didn’t always scoff dismissively at the self-destructive, reactionary, fractious collection of malcontents who call themselves The Resistance. The hundreds of thousands who marched in the streets following Donald Trump’s election once honestly unnerved the GOP. This grassroots energy culminated in January’s Women’s March, a multi-day event in which nearly two million people mobilized peacefully and, most importantly, sympathetically in opposition to the president. It was the perfect antidote to the violent anti-Trump demonstrations that typified Inauguration Day, and it might have formed the nucleus of a politically potent movement. The fall of the Women’s March exposes the blight weakening the left and crippling the Democratic Party.

56
Shares
Google+ Print

Apparently, There Is an Academic Medievalist Far Left

Madness.

Even “Game of Thrones” has not quite rescued medieval studies from its reputation for stodginess. Yet the organizers of this year’s International Medieval Congress must have thought their fellow scholars would think them a teensy bit cool for selecting the theme “otherness.”

20
Shares
Google+ Print

Should the U.S. Revive Nuclear Power?

Keeping the lights on.

Progressives, environmentalists, politicians, and even many corporations have dedicated themselves to increasing the amount of alternative energy Americans produce and use. To many Americans, this means foregoing coal and oil in favor of wind, hydroelectric, or solar power. Fights over the Keystone XL pipeline or Dakota Access Pipeline have less to do with fears of spillage or respect for Native American sacred ground and more to do with antipathy toward expanding gas and oil use and encouraging any further development or exploitation of Canadian oil reserves, especially from Alberta’s tar sands.

8
Shares
Google+ Print