Bailout Fatigue –Finally?

You know things are getting out of hand when the Washington Post rails against “the insidious costs of all bailouts” and invokes a “moral hazard” to critique the latest cash infusion for GMAC. The criticisms come simultaneously from the Left and the Right:

In short, through the GMAC bailout, the U.S. government is enabling GM to overcome (or try to overcome) the market’s resistance to its inferior merchandise — and it is doing so in a way that directly clashes with public goals such as conserving energy and fighting global warming. Perhaps this will indeed be, as GM has vaguely promised, the last hurrah for the second-rate, U.S.-built SUV — or perhaps the government has purchased GM a chance to fail at something new. Either way, it’s another reason to look forward to the recession’s end and to the swiftest possible decoupling of government and big business.

If the Left is concerned about corporate welfare efforts which contradict its social and environmental aspirations, and the Right is worried about the eradication of market discipline,  from what quarter will the support for continued bailouts come? As the new Congress and administration surveys the results of the first round of bailout-mania, it may just be that their ardor for this sort of anti-recession activity fades. Indeed, there’s quite a bit of skepticism in the air, we learn from this report:

Can a $400-million injection of federal bailout money to the “bank to the stars” in Beverly Hills really help revive the troubled U.S. economy? That’s one of the questions the Treasury Department’s inspector general is asking in a review of the decision to award bailout funds to City National Bank. . . [I]nvestigators see the review as a case study into how the Treasury Department is implementing its controversial program to infuse $250 billion into the nation’s banking system and why certain institutions were selected to participate. The program was launched at the peak of the financial crisis in October to strengthen banks and encourage them to lend money, thawing the freeze that has deepened the yearlong recession. But critics are questioning the effectiveness of the effort and whether bureaucrats can ensure that the money will actually be used to make loans.

If Republicans are looking to play a constructive role and join forces with Democrats to help revive the economy, they might suggest a serious bipartisan effort to examine how the bailout money has been spent and what it’s given us. That might be the basis for a fruitful discussion — one that both ends of the political spectrum might embrace — about whether, now that the immediate panic of the financial crisis has passed, we have had quite enough of bailout-mania. Perhaps both parties can begin to recognize that there are better ways to spend taxpayaer money than bailing out incompetently managed firms and failing industries.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Bailout Fatigue –Finally?

Must-Reads from Magazine

We Need to Talk About Genetic Engineering

Sleepwalking toward a revolution.

The most important news of the week was buried underneath an avalanche of dispatches involving palace intrigue in the White House and the Republican Party’s effort to deconstruct the Affordable Care Act. A team of scientists at the Oregon Health and Science University had, according to the MIT Technology Review, used a relatively new gene-editing technique to alter the DNA of a single-cell human embryo.

7
Shares
Google+ Print

A Man With a Plan?

Podcast: Is it a purge or a plan? Or both!

On the second of this week’s podcasts, I get into it with Noah Rothman on whether the president’s behavior toward his attorney general and the new White House communications director’s conduct toward the White House chief of staff constitute a “plan” of action or whether we are just living through nihilistic chaos. Where does Abe Greenwald come out? You’ll have to give a listen.

2
Shares
Google+ Print

Playing Transgender Politics

Posturing, not policy.

On Wednesday morning, at 8:55 a.m., President Trump tweeted: “After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow…” Many in the Pentagon wondered if he was announcing military action against North Korea, which, according to new intelligence estimates, is set to field a nuclear-tipped ICBM as early as next year. Not until nine minutes later was the suspense lifted with another presidential tweet: “…Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.”

11
Shares
Google+ Print

A Secularist vs. the Progressive Faith

A double standard is, in fact, a standard. Just an immoral one.

Really it should come as no surprise that the scientist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins is the latest public figure to have fallen victim to a disinviting mania. After all, if a darling of the left feminist like Germaine Greer can face a campaign to silence her over her views on transgenderism or a woman of color like Ayaan Hirsi Ali can face similar attempts to have her free speech on campus canceled, why should Dawkins be spared?

47
Shares
Google+ Print

Unmasking Is Not a Distraction

Democrats will regret treating this as a partisan issue.

Whenever a former Obama administration official’s name comes up in the process of investigating the Trump campaign’s alleged links to Russian sources, Democrats take the position that the right’s penchant for “whataboutism” neutralizes the implication of wrongdoing. The Democratic objective is to shame those who are committed to crafting a full and unbiased portrait of the events of 2016 into ignoring inconvenient facts, but the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee remains unintimidated.

14
Shares
Google+ Print