They Want to Do What?

Richard Epstein explains what mandatory arbitration means in the context of the Employee Free Choice Act:

An outpost of the Labor Department, the mediation service, will set the terms of all new labor contracts in the United States. It will do so under provisions that are undefined under the act. The FMCS will have sole authority to pick the arbitration panel, which will have the power to draft, on its own initiative, detailed contract provisions, tables and appendices that can run to more than 1,000 pages. The arbitrators’ decision will be final: The EFCA allows neither employers nor unions to appeal arbitrators’ decisions to a neutral judicial body.

In a lengthy research paper, Epstein (here, beginning at page 98) details the multiple Constitutional issues raised by the mandatory arbitration portion of the EFCA, including improper delegation of Congressional powers, lack of judicial review, due process, and takings concerns. These legal issues, to one degree or another, all focus on whether government appointed arbitrators, unchecked by any legal standard or judicial review, can set wages, benefits, and working conditions for thousands of workplaces which are snared in card check organizing. If it sounds unprecedented or like a radical departure from seventy years of federal labor law, it is.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

They Want to Do What?

Must-Reads from Magazine

The Invisible Crisis in Europe

Terrorism's incubator.

America’s immigration debate in recent days has been marked by grandstanding, brinkmanship, and not a little absurdity. Its tone has been degraded, owing mainly to You-Know-Who. But at least Americans are getting to have a debate. That is more than can be said for much of Western and Northern Europe, where mainstream parties for decades have suppressed debate about immigration and assimilation. The result has been a massive crisis of social cohesion and physical security–one that remains invisible to those, on both sides of the Atlantic, who treat any dissent from the policy status quo as beyond the pale.

24
Shares
Google+ Print

The ‘Resistance’ Is Futile

Schumer isn't the problem.

The sense of betrayal among the self-styled liberal “Resistance” to Donald Trump is palpable. New York Times opinion columnist Michelle Goldberg called it “infuriating” to “see the Senate Democratic leadership” give up the ill-conceived three-day government shutdown and “sell the Dreamers out.” “They blinked,” said outgoing Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez, “because they’ll always put the party and the success of the party first.” “Today’s cave by Senate Democrats—led by weak-kneed, right-of-center Democrats—is why people don’t believe the Democratic Party stands for anything,” lamented Stephanie Taylor, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee. That word, “cave,” is the same expression Donald Trump’s reelection campaign used to describe how congressional Democrats climbed down from the high-stakes gambit they let get out of hand.

25
Shares
Google+ Print

Shut Down Senselessness

Podcast: Government shut down, ???, profit!

John Podhoretz is out today. In his absence, the remaining COMMENTARY Magazine hosts untangle the complicated policy and politics behind a short-lived government shutdown. Who benefits, who doesn’t, and what was at stake? Did this brief cessation of non-essential government activity change the political landscape ahead of 2018? Give a listen.

2
Shares
Google+ Print

The Democrats’ CHIP Hypocrisy

Mixed messaging.

Congressional Democrats appear to have meandered into a cul-de-sac. Ostensibly, the federal government shut down last week during an impasse over whether to make the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) permanent this month or next. Democrats had threatened to shut down the government over DACA recipients before but backed off amid mounting objections from the party’s moderate governing wing. As public polling has confirmed, Americans are in favor of legal status for this deserving set of illegal immigrants who suffer that status through no fault of their own, but voters do not believe that outcome is worth a government shutdown. It’s therefore reasonable to expect that Democrats will soon shift gears, leaning into the other ostensible reason why the government shut down: lapsed funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Yet here, too, the Democrats and their allies in media are playing a double game.

44
Shares
Google+ Print

Democrats Go Soft on Anti-Semitism

Shameful.

I don’t always agree with Kenneth L. Marcus, the founder and president of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law. But he is without question the kind of person who might have been nominated in any Republican administration to serve as assistant secretary of education for civil rights. In fact, Marcus served in the same role in the George W. Bush administration on an interim basis. Yet Marcus received not one Democratic vote in the Senate Health, Labor, and Pensions Committee, which just voted 12-11, on party lines, to advance his nomination.

56
Shares
Google+ Print