Final Club Finale

Must-Reads from Magazine

Over-Population: The Malthusian Myth That Refuses to Die

A dangerous idea makes a comeback.

The word “ethics” frequently appears in the biographies of the authors who penned a recent Washington Post op-ed lamenting the “taboo” associated with “talking about overpopulation.” Frances Kissling is the president of the Center for Health, Ethics, and Social Policy. Peter Singer is a professor of bioethics at Princeton University. Only Jotham Musinguzi, the “director general of Uganda’s National Population Council,” manages to avoid distorting the definition of the word by attaching his name to this piece. The Malthusian prescriptions these “ethicists” apply to the forever-looming “Population Bomb” have nothing to do with ethics.

Click to write a letter to the editor

Fill out the form below to reach our editors

  • required, for your letter to see publication
0
Shares
Google+ Print

Conservatives Against Virtue

The virtue of virtue.

At some point over the past two or three years–I’m not sure when exactly–“virtue” became a dirty word on the American right. There’s not a little irony in this development. If there’s one commitment that is supposed to tie the various strands of American conservatism, it’s the cultivation of the human virtues–those habits of the human spirit that aim at its perfection: Prudence, justice, courage, and temperance, according to the classical definition.

Click to write a letter to the editor

Fill out the form below to reach our editors

  • required, for your letter to see publication
9
Shares
Google+ Print

PODCAST: This Is a Land of Confusion

Podcast: Border battles and the OIG report.

The implementation of a policy that separates illegal border-crossing children from their parents has thrown the Trump administration into crisis, in part, because no one is on the same page. Depending on the official speaking, this policy is either a necessary deterrent to future migrants, an unfortunate vestigial artifact of the Obama administration, or the law of the land. The hosts break down the political effect of the White House’s confusion. Also, the COMMENTARY Podcast breaks down the Justice Department’s Inspector General’s report that savages James Comey’s behavior in 2016 and suggests FBI Agent Peter Strzok’s anti-Trump bias might have had an effect on the product of the FBI’s Russia probe.

Click to write a letter to the editor

Fill out the form below to reach our editors

  • required, for your letter to see publication
0
Shares
Google+ Print