Americans Mixed on Gitmo

The tide of international public opinion is decisively against Guantanamo Bay. Obama’s recent decision to close down the controversial detention center may be sincerely motivated by the premise of “boosting America’s image abroad.” Domestically, however, it will be a tougher sell because Americans seem to harbor mixed feelings toward Gitmo. Here’s Gallup:

Americans are sending no clear mandate on the issue. Slightly more think the United States should not close the prison than say it should, 45% to 35%. These views are similar to those expressed in 2007, at which time 33% favored closing the prison but 53% were opposed and 13% had no opinion. The major difference since that time is that slightly fewer now favor keeping the prison open (from 53% to 45%), and slightly more do not express an opinion (from 13% to 20%).

I don’t mean to suggest that major policy resolutions should be decided by public opinion polls. But these figures reflect the complexity of Americans’ attitudes toward Gitmo, which should therefore not be characterized as a black and white issue. It’s a complicated matter deserving serious consideration rather than political manipulation along partisan lines. Obama is taking on a risky political gamble with his hasty move to close down Gitmo. More from Gallup:

President Obama’s most loyal supporters — Democrats and liberals — do lean decisively toward closing the U.S. prison there. But Americans overall do not express such a clear preference, and in fact are more likely to prefer keeping the prison open. While swift action to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay will draw a clear dividing line between the policies of the Bush Administration versus the Obama Administration, it is more likely to be well-received by Obama’s most loyal base of support than by the broader cross-section of Americans who have generally given high marks to Obama’s presidential decisions so far. If Obama does choose to close the prison, which these data suggest would go against public opinion, at least to an extent, it could provide an early test of how much Americans’ high ratings of Obama to date will reflect the more controversial decisions Obama, as president, will now be forced to make.

A similar poll conducted last year by Rasmussen likewise suggests Obama hasn’t persuaded Americans on this issue. The poll’s results are from November of 2008: by a 49% to 32% margin, Americans reported that they do not think the prison should be closed. However:

Fifty-five percent (55%) of Republicans and 54% of unaffiliated voters say Obama is very likely to close the prison in his first year as president…

Even though Americans expected Obama to close Gitmo, and in spite of their confidence in Obama and support for his decisions, they are still unconvinced that closing this detention center is the right way to go. Whether they will change their minds after the fact remains to be seen. But even if they do give him the benefit of the doubt for now, the faintest hint of trouble on the terrorism front will retroactively make this move problematic.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Americans Mixed on Gitmo

Must-Reads from Magazine

Challenging Violent Speech—Unless It’s About Israel

The border of incitement.

The idea that speech can itself constitute an act of violence grows ever more popular among the left’s leading polemicists. They argue that employing a politically incorrect word can be triggering; that the wrong gender pronoun can provoke; that words and sentences and parts of speech are all acts of aggression in disguise. The left seeks to stop this violence, or less euphemistically: to silence this speech.

6
Shares
Google+ Print

Russian Undressing: An Explanation

Podcast: How bad is it?

On the first of this week’s COMMENTARY podcasts, Noah Rothman and Abe Greenwald join me to sort through—and we do it systematically, which is a first for us—what is going on with the Russia investigation and how it divides into three categories. There’s the question of the probe itself, there’s the question of collusion, and there’s the question of obstruction of justice. It’s really good. I mean it. Give a listen.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Polish Democracy in the Balance

Democracy dies while the president looks the other way.

Past U.S. presidents have used their bully pulpit to campaign for human-rights and democracy. By encouraging the unprecedented wave of democratization that has swept the world since 1945, their words and actions had consequences. That’s not something that Donald Trump does. Far from it; he positively praises dictators. His words have consequences, too, and they are not good.

1
Shares
Google+ Print

How Corruption Cripples American Universities

Are the rewards worth the costs?

Universities may be non-profit, but they are big business. At the end of fiscal year 2015, for example, Harvard, Yale, and Princeton’s endowments were $38 billion, $26 billion, and $22 billion respectively. Those are correspondingly equivalent to the gross domestic products of Mongolia, Cyprus, and the West Bank and Gaza. University presidents make salaries on par with and often higher than corporate CEOs. Fundraising—traveling the world glad-handing alumni and lobbying—rather than academe has become the primary function of many university presidents.

7
Shares
Google+ Print

Republicans Need to Prepare for the Worst

Expect the impossible.

If the 2016 presidential election cycle demonstrated anything, it was that Republicans suffer from a crippling lack of imagination. That ordeal should have established that the unprecedented is not impossible. Even now, Republicans seem as though they are trying to convince themselves that their eyes are lying to them, but they are not. The tempo of the investigation into President Trump is accelerating, and a nightmare scenario is eminently imaginable. Only congressional Republicans can avert disaster, and only then by being clear about the actions they are prepared to take if Trump instigates a crisis of constitutional legitimacy.

114
Shares
Google+ Print