Article of the Week…

…is by COMMENTARY’s own Andrew Ferguson, in the new Weekly Standard. Entitled “The Roots of Lunacy,” this superb piece of political analysis and cultural takedown considers the way in which political hatred morphs over time, with particular emphasis on Dinesh D’Souza’s new bestseller, The Roots of Obama’s Rage. Andy’s point in the end is that looking for explanations for the origins of Obama’s politics is a ridiculous exercise since he is simply an “unchecked liberal” who is likely more moderate than a President Kerry or a President Edwards would have been. I don’t think that’s right; Obama’s unchecked liberalism is of an order different from the liberalism of anyone who might have served in his stead owing to the fact that it really is unchecked by any experience in political or ideological compromise of any sort. Edwards was a Democratic pol in a Southern state and had some sense at least of how to talk to people who don’t agree with him; Kerry served in the Senate for a very long time under Democratic and Republican majorities and at least had learned how to maneuver in a heterodox partisan atmosphere. None of that is true of Obama, whose inexperience both helped get him elected and now gives him absolutely no sense of how to handle the turnaround in the national mood or the disenchantment of the voters with him. Ideologically, he gives one the sense that the only conservative he’s ever talked to is David Brooks, and he views the plurality of the electorate that uses the word “conservative” to describe itself as a strange, distasteful foreign creature whose president he also, unfortunately, must be.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Article of the Week…

Must-Reads from Magazine

Amnesty Don Strikes

The best opponent Democrats could hope for.

Mere days ago, Breitbart’s Steve Bannon told “60 Minutes” that “our purpose is to support Donald Trump.” Then, on Wednesday, Trump decided to make an immigration deal with Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi over Chinese food. Within minutes, Breitbart was dubbing the president it had pledged to support “Amnesty Don.”

44
Shares
Google+ Print

The Debt Crisis Is Here: Now What?

Three modest proposals.

Is there a solution to the ever-spiraling national debt? Sure, but it won’t be easy, as the beneficiaries of the status quo—members of Congress—will have to vote to end the spree, jeopardizing their personal, short-term political interests. Not many members of Congress would be willing to do that if they have an alternative. After all, there’s a reason why Profiles in Courage is a short book.
But here’s the solution:
1) Make the president—the only person in Washington who represents the national interest—a major player in the budget battles again. First, empower the president to set the total annual spending limit, subject to a congressional override by a two-thirds vote in each house. Second, give him a line-item veto, something possessed by 44 state governors. The first would definitely require a constitutional amendment, the latter probably. (A Republican Congress gave President Clinton a line-item veto, but it was struck down by the Supreme Court, 6-3. With a little tweaking, and a more conservative court, it might pass constitutional muster.)
2) Force the government to keep honest books, just as corporations must. The federal government’s books are a tissue of lies and deceits purposefully designed to obscure the real fiscal situation. Corporate management goers to jail for such accounting practices. Establish a truly independent accounting board, modeled on the Federal Reserve, which would have the sole power to keep the federal books and keep them according to generally accepted accounting principles. It would also “score” proposed legislation as to future costs and revenues, a function now performed by the Congressional Budget Office, which has an utterly dismal record of doing it well. Legislation could effect this reform.
3) Reform the tax code, radically simplifying it in the process.  First, strip away the tens of thousands of special-interest provisions slipped into the code by members of Congress who repay their major donors this way. Second, merge the personal and corporate income taxes. For a hundred years, their separation has been the main engine of tax complexity and of tax avoidance by the very rich. This, too, could be the product of legislation.
Congress, a deeply dysfunctional political institution at this point, cannot reform its ways by itself. Only a president politically empowered by an electoral mandate earned by running on a platform of severe fiscal reform can force it to do so.
The United States, by far the richest country in world history, is not yet at the fiscal tipping point. We can afford the current national debt. But if interest rates return to normal levels, which at some point they must, increased interest costs will rapidly crowd out other spending, producing a political crisis.
And if the country should find itself in a military or economic crisis such as we experienced three times in the first half of the 20th century, then our ability to deal with it by throwing the cost onto the future will be severely compromised. It is an iron law of economics that you can’t borrow a dollar twice without paying it back first.
If we reach that tipping point, there will be only two options. Either there will be massive cuts in federal spending, which would throw the economy into a severe and protracted recession, or there will be a hyperinflation that would destroy the value of dollar-denominated assets, such as federal bonds. In other words, Germany, 1923.
24
Shares
Google+ Print

A Special All-Gloating Podcast!

Podcast: Who saw this coming? We did.

Yes, we told you so, and we say it again and again on the second of this week’s COMMENTARY podcasts. Noah Rothman, Abe Greenwald, and I attempt to examine the political menage-a-trois between Trump, Schumer, and Pelosi, whom it helps, whom it hurts, and the pain and agony of people who took Donald Trump at his word. Give a listen.

9
Shares
Google+ Print

Told You So

A carney act.

We tried to warn you. We sifted through the rhetoric, dissected the policy pronouncements, and took Donald Trump far more seriously than he took himself. Especially when it came to then-candidate Trump’s over-the-top rhetoric in support of immigration restrictionism and border security, we said the Manhattanite who only recently converted to the GOP was simply playing a role. On Thursday morning, the president confirmed his critics’ assumptions.

23
Shares
Google+ Print

The Debt Crisis Is Here

And what has it bought us?

Last Friday, September 8th, 2017, the national debt of the United States went over $20 trillion. This compares with an estimated GDP of $19.3 trillion. For the first time in 70 years, since the immediate aftermath of World War II, the national debt exceeds 100 percent of GDP.

45
Shares
Google+ Print