Monsanto For the Win!

On Wednesday night, Intelligence Squared U.S. held an enlightening debate on genetically modified foods on the Upper West Side of Manhattan (video here). As anyone with a web browser knows, companies like Monsanto are now routinely portrayed in the media (especially social media) as the epitome of corporate evil. The idea is that GMO companies are remorselessly destroying the earth and poisoning mankind with Frankenstein foods in order to line the pockets of their one-percenter CEOs. Well, a fascinating thing happened very early in the debate that shed light on all this. Charles Benbrook, a research professor at the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources was asked about the scientific consensus, developed over 20 years, on the health impact of genetically modified food. Here’s his response:

I’ve read essentially all the statements by various bodies. And here’s what they essentially all say. They use slightly different words. They say that genetic – the genetic engineering of food as a technology does not create any new or different potential risks in the modified foods that other forms of plant breeding don’t. Several of the reports, including both of the two national academy of science reports that specifically address this say that there is a possibility that genetically engineered foods may pose higher risk of that nature, but we really don’t know. They also all say that there’s no convincing evidence now or at this point that there’s been acute health problems in the U.S. population from the consumption of genetically engineered foods. And then they all go on to call for further investment in the development of more sensitive, scientific techniques to assess the possibility risks, and they also call for post approval surveillance. Most of the recommendations for better science, more careful risk assessment and post market surveillance that have been made for over 15 years, and these reports have not been acted upon.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Monsanto For the Win!

Must-Reads from Magazine

The Only Country with No Right to a Normal Foreign Policy

Glaring hypocrisy.

The news that Hungary’s prime minister will visit Israel next week has sparked outrage from liberal Jews both in Israel and abroad. Opponents raise two main objections. One would be serious if true, but it doesn’t seem to be. The other is sheer hypocrisy–and it’s an excellent example of the way liberal Jews routinely hold Israel to standards they apply to no other country on earth.

40
Shares
Google+ Print

The Iranian Terror State Targets Europe

The Iran deal haunts its sponsors.

In a rare lucid moment in January 2016, then-Secretary of State John Kerry admitted that the Tehran regime would use some of the funds from the Iranian nuclear deal to fund terrorism.

49
Shares
Google+ Print

The Power-Hungry Left Loses Its Cool

Hypocrisy is no obstacle.

In the early days of “The Resistance,” back when the movement was purportedly focused on forming broad coalitions that spanned ideological divides, it was common to hear its members lament Donald Trump’s assault on treasured American norms and conventions. The patina of legitimacy this organizing principle lent to the anti-Trump left’s more unsavory members and tactics is no longer operative. For the power-starved left, it seems that those norms and conventions are part of the problem.

50
Shares
Google+ Print

PODCAST: Which Side Are You On, Boys

Podcast: The pro-and anti-Trump conservative debate.

Brit Hume argues on Twitter: “I suppose you can also be pro-tax cuts, pro-deregulation, pro-defense increases, pro-gun rights, pro-life and anti-Trump. But at some point, it begins to seem ridiculous.” John McCormack of the Weekly Standard ripostes: “I suppose you can oppose sexual assault, conspiracy theories, lying, adultery, mocking American POWs, sanitizing dictators & white supremacists, and still be pro-Trump. But at some point, it begins to seem ridiculous.” This perfect distillation of the fight on the Right is the subject of maybe the best podcast we’ve ever done. Give a listen.

11
Shares
Google+ Print

German Wobbliness on Russia Is Real

And it long predates Trump.

The latest NATO summit got underway in Brussels this week, and President Trump brought all of his signature rhetorical subtlety to the Belgian capital. Off the bat at a meeting Wednesday with NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, Trump accused Germany of being “captive” to Russia. The remark ruffled diplomatic feathers in the Western alliance and touched off a predictable freakout among reporters and pundits back home.

85
Shares
Google+ Print