Robert Redford’s War on History

In 2013, the term “radical chic” is a cultural reference so dated that it is more or less the moral equivalent of someone mouthing the catch phrases of the Roaring Twenties in the 1960s. The era when liberal intellectuals and elite cultural figures paid homage to a violent and radical left is so far distant that it may be difficult for Americans growing up in the second decade of the 21st century to sense its significance. Suffice it to say that the willingness of so many people who ought to have known better to think of either Weather Underground terrorists or Black Panther thugs as idealists is among the most dishonorable moments in America’s cultural history.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Robert Redford’s War on History

Must-Reads from Magazine

How Israel Passed the Justice Test

The announcement by the Israeli government of indictments in the shocking arson murder of an Arab family in a West Bank village last summer is, in a very real sense, not a big deal. In decent nations, those who commit murder shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it no matter what the circumstances. hThat it took several months of investigations and interrogations of suspects was regrettable but, assuming that the case has been solved, the final result in which the guilty are punished is the main thing. Israel neither seeks nor deserves any special honors for enforcing the law. But there is nothing ordinary about this case. By putting the full resources of the state behind an effort to punish a Jew for killing Arabs in the midst of a bloody national conflict testifies to the resilience and the integrity of Israeli democracy and the rule of law.

6
Shares
Google+ Print

A Problem With One Man Government

After all the hoopla about President Obama unilaterally changing the nation’s gun laws, the executive order he plans to promulgate this week doesn’t amount to much. The order, which will be announced sometime this week and then promoted on a prime-time town hall broadcast on CNN on Thursday night, will increase the number of small-scale gun sellers that will be required to get federal licenses and thus be forced to conduct background checks on buyers. An executive order that will tighten the rules about reporting lost or stolen guns will also be promulgated. But while these new regulations will make the lives of a number of honest citizens who collect or sell firearms as a sideline or a hobby more difficult, they won’t do a thing to prevent mass shootings. Nor will they do a thing to prevent terrorists from carrying out attacks — the country’s main domestic security concern — in the United States.

38
Shares
Google+ Print

Return Meaning to Terrorism List

Over the last 24 hours, Pakistani-harbored terrorists attacked India’s Pathankot base in the Punjab province, and subsequently attacked India’s consulate in the northern Afghan town of Mazar-i-Sharif. The attackers appear to have been trained by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency. Diplomats might try to obfuscate, but the facts are clear: Pakistan is a state-sponsor of terrorism.

10
Shares
Google+ Print

The Choice Facing Israeli Arabs

On Friday as much of the world celebrate the first day of 2016, Israelis reeled from a horrifying shooting on a busy Tel Aviv street in which two people were killed by an Israeli Arab gunman who later also murdered the driver of the cab that he had used to make his escape. The incident led to two entirely predictable results: the rest of the world barely noticed the crime and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statements about what happened generated severe criticism from his political opponents for “inciting” hatred against Arabs. While some of the brickbats tossed at Netanyahu are not without merit, his speech at the site of the shooting on Saturday night raised some interesting questions about the ethnic divide within Israel that deserve serious thought rather than airy dismissal.

15
Shares
Google+ Print

Requiem for a Failed Foreign Policy

It’s always a good time to review the histrionics that characterized the New York Times editorial board’s coverage of the Iraq War, particularly in the months leading up to the “surge.” With sectarian tensions in the Middle East rising to a level unimagined in even the darkest days of the Iraq insurgency, today is a particularly compelling day to review one of the Bush administration’s most critical news outlets.

56
Shares
Google+ Print