The Washington Post Explains (Sort Of)

Last week, I contacted the Washington Post’s ombudsman Andrew Alexander with a series of questions about the offensive Pat Oliphant cartoon which recently ran in the Post, including how many complaints they had received, why they had not reported on the ensuing controversy and what polices if any the Post considered in deciding to run it. He promptly responded, “The Oliphant cartoon has been removed from washingtonpost.com. I received about  8-10 complaints.” As to my other questions, he invited me to contact the Post’s managing editor Raju Narisetti. I did so immediately. I posed these questions:

1.Does the Post have any standards/guidelines which were considered in determining to run the cartoon? Were they followed in this instance?
2.Why then was the cartoon removed from the website?
3. Do the editors have comment on the reaction that this was not mere criticism but actually anti-Semitic?
4. The NY Post apologized for the ape cartoon following a public outcry. Does the Post intend to offer any public apology or defense?
5. Is there a reason why the Post did not cover the controversy which it generated and/or the outcry from the Jewish community?

He never responded. Instead I received this response from Kris Coratti, Director of Communications:

Syndicated cartoons are not chosen by the editors at washingtonpost.com.  They are posted through an automatic feed.  We removed the specific cartoon in light of the comments we received, which we thought were well-grounded.  We are also reviewing our procedures to ensure that syndicated content on our website receives appropriate editorial review.

I asked her to respond to the balance of my questions, specifically numbers 3-5. I have received no response.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

The Washington Post Explains (Sort Of)

Must-Reads from Magazine

Republicans Need to Prepare for the Worst

Expect the impossible.

If the 2016 presidential election cycle demonstrated anything, it was that Republicans suffer from a crippling lack of imagination. That ordeal should have established that the unprecedented is not impossible. Even now, Republicans seem as though they are trying to convince themselves that their eyes are lying to them, but they are not. The tempo of the investigation into President Trump is accelerating, and a nightmare scenario is eminently imaginable. Only congressional Republicans can avert disaster, and only then by being clear about the actions they are prepared to take if Trump instigates a crisis of constitutional legitimacy.

48
Shares
Google+ Print

Can Turkey be Trusted with F-35s?

Are the warplane's secrets safe?

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is the newest generation air platform for the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marines. Lockheed-Martin, which builds the F-35, describes it as “a 5th Generation fighter, combining advanced stealth with fighter speed and agility, fully fused sensor information, network-enabled operations and advanced sustainment.” For both diplomatic reasons and to encourage sales, Lockheed-Martin subcontracted the production of many F-35 components to factories abroad. Many program partners—Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, Denmark, for example—are consistent U.S. allies.

31
Shares
Google+ Print

The Trump Right’s Martyrdom of Kim Guadagno

Too many martyrs make a movement.

If the GOP is to be converted into a vehicle for politicians who evince Donald Trump’s brand of pragmatic center-right populism, Trump will have to demonstrate his brand of politics can deliver victories for people other than himself. Presidential pen strokes help to achieve that, as do judicial appointments. Nothing is so permanent, though, as sweeping legislative change. On that score, the newly Trumpian Republican Party is coming up short. If the passive process of transformational legislative success fails to compel anti-Trump holdouts in the GOP to give up the ghost, there is always arm-twisting. It seems the Republican National Committee is happy to play enforcer.

13
Shares
Google+ Print

The Conservative Crack-Up, 2017 Edition

Podcast: Conservatism in shackles while O.J. goes free?

On the second of this week’s podcasts, I ask Abe Greenwald and Noah Rothman whether the health-care debacle this week is simply a reflection of the same pressures on the conservative coalition Donald Trump saw and conquered by running for president last year—and what it will mean for him and them that he has provided no rallying point for Republican politicians. And then we discuss OJ Simpson. Give a listen.

4
Shares
Google+ Print

Macron’s Terrorism Idiocy

Hyperbole yields cynicism, not the other way around.

Newly-elected French President Emmanuel Macron surprised almost everyone when he invited President Donald Trump to celebrate Bastille Day with him in Paris, especially after the two leaders’ awkward first meeting in Brussels in May. After all, between now and then, Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Change Agreement, and Macron has become perhaps the most vocal critic of Trump among European leaders.

15
Shares
Google+ Print