Why Do Academics Downplay Repression?

The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC)—the NGO of the Society of Friends or Quakers—won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1947, largely for its work with refugees, children, and prisoners of war during both World Wars I and II. The AFSC stayed neutral—a principle which it embraced strictly at the time—but by the 1970s, the AFSC had allowed leftism to trump pacifism. Perhaps nothing symbolizes the politicization of the AFSC and its moral unbearing than how it shilled for Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge—an episode discussed at length in Guenter Lewy’s Peace and Revolution, until evidence of that group’s murder of a million citizens became insurmountable. Why politics blinded AFSC officials to the brutality of the Khmer Rouge up until that group’s public exposure, however, is something that the Society of Friends has never adequately explained.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Why Do Academics Downplay Repression?

Must-Reads from Magazine

America’s Secret Boots on the Ground

Ever since President Obama sent U.S. forces back to Iraq in August, 2014 to fight ISIS — a terrorist group that grew up in the vacuum that he left by pulling U.S. troops out at the end of 2011 — the president has repeatedly promised that U.S. troops would not go into combat. By last fall, he had uttered some variation of the phrase “no boots on the ground” at least sixteen times. On September 10, 2014, for example, he said: “I want the American people to understand how this effort will be different from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil.”

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Is Cruz More Than Just Non-Trump?

Donald Trump didn’t surface in the wake of his drubbing last night in Wisconsin. But last night and then this morning, Trump did send forth campaign aides to trash the man who beat him. The attacks, which attempted to depict Cruz as “worse than a puppet” and a “Trojan horse” being used by “the Bush people” to steal the nomination from Trump didn’t do much to lessen the sting of what turned out to be a landslide loss for the frontrunner. But this is more than just the usual bad loser routine for Trump. The irony here is that Trump’s new line of attack on Cruz shows us how far the Texas senator has come. He entered the presidential race as a niche candidate who seemed unable to appeal to voters outside of the Tea Party or evangelicals. But after his latest victory, the question is whether GOP voters are starting to think of Cruz as something more than just the lesser of evils as the leading non-Trump in the race. The outcome of the GOP contest will probably hinge on whether Cruz can transcend what we all assumed to be his limitations and give Trump a real run for his money in the remaining primaries.

2
Shares
Google+ Print

The Trump Campaign’s Identity Crisis

As the unsettled political earth shifts again under the nation’s feet, the latest iteration of the dominant conventional wisdom – that nothing Donald Trump could say or do would compel his core voters to reassess their support – is under threat. This is all rather jarring. The commentary class only recently, and under protest, accepted this unnerving truth despite the fact that it contradicted virtually every lesson gleaned from the study of decades of electoral politics. This disorienting state of affairs is, however, nothing compared to the befuddling behavior in which the Trump campaign is engaged. There are not merely “two different Donald Trumps,” as the celebrity candidate’s hapless surrogate Ben Carson famously said; there are two different Trump campaigns. Both exist simultaneously and in a state of conflict, with one continuously undermining the other.

9
Shares
Google+ Print

War of the Damaged Candidates!

In this week’s COMMENTARY MAGAZINE Podcast, we (Noah Rothman, Abe Greenwald, and I) examine the bizarre fact that all four of the leading candidates for the presidency are in problematic shape—Trump (Mr. High Negatives) and Clinton (Mrs. Lost Six In A Row) having been shellacked in Wisconsin by contenders who have significant weaknesses of their own. They say Clinton can’t lose, but on the other hand, she keeps losing. And now people say Trump can’t win, but does that mean Ted Cruz can win? Will the madness never end? Enjoy!

0
Shares
Google+ Print

The Islamist Threat beyond ISIS

This week, I traveled to Lewis & Clark College in Portland, Oregon, to take part in a student-organized international affairs symposium featuring a discussion on what happens next in the fight against ISIS. It’s a natural subject — and the students did a great job of organizing this event, now in its 54th year. I and other national security types spend a lot of our time these days opining on the future of ISIS. That also remains a leading topic in the media and the halls of power in Washington. In the process, however, I fear that we are losing sight of the big picture.

6
Shares
Google+ Print