Does Obama Have a Foreign Policy Edge?

It is a fact of political life that the 2012 presidential election will not turn on foreign policy. Unless something terrible happens between now and November, the focus of most voters will remain on the country’s failing economy. That’s probably okay with Mitt Romney because, unlike most Republican nominees in recent decades, prowess in foreign policy and defense issues are not among his strengths. According to New York Times columnist David Brooks, Romney’s inability to delineate strong points of disagreement with President Obama’s policies is not only a sign of the GOP standard bearer’s weakness but an indication that the incumbent can go to the people claiming to be a success on foreign policy. Though Brooks is right to characterize Romney as having done an inadequate job of articulating his foreign policy vision, his praise for the president is undeserved.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Does Obama Have a Foreign Policy Edge?

Must-Reads from Magazine

A Conclusion in Search of Evidence

Donald Trump's immigration ban is a policy without logic.

Presidents are supposed to take intelligence findings and formulate policies accordingly. All too often, though, there is a temptation to reach conclusions and then cherry-pick evidence to support them. That tendency has been taken to an extreme by the Trump administration in the formulation of its infamous executive order on immigration.

16
Shares
Google+ Print

The War on Truth in Europe

Russia's distortions are blurring the line between truth and lies.

There has been a lot of talk in the United States lately about “fake news” (the accusation that President Trump tosses out to discredit unfavorable articles) and “alternative facts” (the phrase that Kellyanne Conway used to justify the White House propagation of falsehoods about the size of the inaugural crowd and other matters). But it’s important to remember that these devices were neither invented in the United States nor confined to our shores. Russia is the world leader in both areas, if in nothing else.

148
Shares
Google+ Print

A Reform to Stand the Test of Time

For Republicans, it’s time to choose: their careers or their country.

While it may be a dated version of a working draft of the GOP’s replacement for the Affordable Care Act, the text of legislation that is circulating in the press provides political observers with a window into how the Republican Party plans to “repeal and replace” ObamaCare. For conservatives, there is a lot in the proposal to like, but also provisions that are troubling. Naturally, the latter will get the most attention. The political intractability of some ObamaCare provisions demonstrates the permanence of sweeping reform legislation and why Republicans might be better served by adjusting their priorities.

12
Shares
Google+ Print

North Korea’s Chemical Terrorism

North Korea Deploys WMD on Malaysian soil.

Hope always springs eternal that newly appointed dictators will be kinder and gentler than their predecessors. But whether it’s Bashar Assad in Syria or Kim Jong-un in North Korea, it turns out that the scions of dictatorial dynasties are even more deadly than their parents and never the “reformers” they were once touted to be. Assad, of course, is responsible for the vast majority of deaths in a Syrian civil war that has claimed as many as half a million victims. Kim, meanwhile, is becoming famous for killing his relatives—first his uncle, Jang Sung-taek, was eliminated in 2013 and now he has assassinated his half-brother, Kim Jong-nam.

12
Shares
Google+ Print

Social Conservatism’s Resurrection

Social conservatism isn't dead. Far from it.

The Trump administration has a peculiar view of federalism. The Trump White House believes the Obama-era guidelines designed to expand restroom access to transgender students are an offense against the 10th Amendment. Yet at the same time, the administration also warned the public to expect a crackdown on those states that have legalized recreational marijuana use. Presumably, unlike public restrooms, that’s an issue the White House believes should not devolve to the states, but the logic here appears arbitrary and contradictory. From a strictly constitutionalist perspective, it is. Only through the lens of social conservatism can this conflict be reconciled.