How’s That Iran Détente Working?

Earlier this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Russian President Vladimir Putin about Moscow’s military build up in Syria. But though relations between Israel and Russia have been relatively friendly in recent years, Netanyahu got no more satisfaction from Putin than he has recently received from President Obama. The authoritarian leader assured him that the Russians in Syria had no hostile intentions toward Israel and that the tottering Syrian government was too tied up fighting for its life against ISIS and other rebel groups to pose any threat to it either. Both those assertions are probably true. But what was missing from that reassurance was any promise that Russia’s main ally in propping up the Assad regime in Damascus would not use the chaos in Syria to undermine Israel’s security. The collapse of Syria has allowed Iran a way to open a new front against Israel as Hezbollah forces have consolidated their hold on part of the border with Israel. If Israel is upset about what is going on in Syria, it isn’t so much its concerns about the efforts on the part of the Russians to prop up Assad and assure security of its base at Latakia. Rather, it is the way the financial windfall Iran will receive as a result of signing the Iran nuclear deal is enabling it strengthen both Hezbollah and Hamas.

28
Shares
Google+ Print

How’s That Iran Détente Working?

Must-Reads from Magazine

The Niger Ambush and the Neoconservative World

The demands of the post-9/11 world.

On October 4, four U.S. Special Forces soldiers were killed amid an ambush by Islamist insurgents in Niger. In grief and shock, Americans are starting to ask why the United States is so extended abroad, even to places like Sub-Saharan Africa where our geopolitical interests are unclear. Something went wrong in Niger. It is incumbent on both the press and Congress to seek out answers as to what happened. Without jeopardizing it, American voters deserve to have a fuller understanding of the U.S. mission in North Africa. Some, however, have used these deaths to vindicate their preexisting antipathy toward American troop commitments abroad. The impulse to posture scandalized about U.S. forward positioning is not just logically flawed; it is reflective of a misunderstanding of America’s role in a post-9/11 world.

11
Shares
Google+ Print

$32 Million? Oh, Really? No, O’Reilly

Podcast: A misconception about the war on terror.

On this week’s first COMMENTARY podcast, we stand agog at the personal $32 million payout by former #1 cable news star Bill O’Reilly and what it means about the sexual harassment scandals and the way they are changing the rules. Then we move on to simpler matters, like American foreign policy and the ambush in Niger. Give a listen.

3
Shares
Google+ Print

John Kelly Changed the Game

When Trump fights on values, he wins.

For approximately 18 minutes, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly accomplished the impossible: He got America’s journalists and political opinion writers to shut up and listen.

45
Shares
Google+ Print

Bush’s Finest Hour

More than just Trump.

On Thursday, George W. Bush delivered a speech at the “Spirit of Liberty: At Home, In The World” event in New York City. Headlines are touting the speech as an attack on Trumpism. That’s accurate, so far as it goes. But it’s clear from Bush’s words that he was aiming for (and achieved) something loftier than yet another complaint about the 45th president. Bush was making the case against the pervasive discontent that’s driven many citizens throughout the Democratic West to a politics of grievance and revenge. Trumpism is but one example.

52
Shares
Google+ Print

The Danger of the Me Too Campaign

Denunciations.

Silence, Wordsworth wrote, “is a privilege of the grave, a right of the departed. Let him, therefore, who infringes that right by speaking publicly of, for, or against, those who cannot speak for themselves, take heed that he opens not his mouth without a sufficient sanction.”

41
Shares
Google+ Print