The Five Fatal Flaws in the Iran Deal

On Tuesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee heard testimony from Amb. Robert G. Joseph, Ph.D, currently Senior Scholar at the National Institute for Public Policy, formerly Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, and the person who in 2003 led the nuclear negotiations with Libya. He testified the Iran deal is a “bad agreement” with “five fatal flaws”: (1) it does not effectively detect cheating unless Iran decides to do it openly, and Iran is more likely to cheat at military bases where it has cheated in the past and has ruled out inspections in the future; (2) it leaves a large‐scale nuclear infrastructure in place that could be used to break out, or more likely “sneak‐out,” and then permits a significantly expanded program with a “virtually zero” breakout time; (3) it has “snap‐back” provisions that are illusory; (4) the purported 12-month breakout time is ineffective, since, unless Iran breaks out openly, we will not even know when the clock begins,and months will go by while the U.S. debates internally what to do; and (5) Iran is permitted to continue work on long-range ballistic missiles that have no use other than eventual deployment of nuclear weapons. His conclusion is stark:

[The deal] assumes that permitting Iran a large‐scale enrichment capability is compatible with the goal of denying Iran the ability to produce weapons‐grade fissile material; it assumes that the twelve month breakout time is meaningful; it assumes that the agreement will be effectively verifiable; and it assumes that the United States and the international community will respond to evidence of cheating before Iran can mate a nuclear weapon to a ballistic missile. None of these assumptions holds up under scrutiny. As a result, the threat to the U.S. homeland and to our NATO allies of an Iran armed with nuclear tipped ballistic missiles will increase not decrease under the anticipated agreement. [Emphasis added].

And that is even before considering the risks of proliferation in the region, the existential threat to Israel, seriously frayed relations with Arab allies, and the vastly increased resources for Iran and its allies to establish a game-changing hegemony in a vital strategic area of the world.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

The Five Fatal Flaws in the Iran Deal

Must-Reads from Magazine

The War on Truth in Europe

Russia's distortions are blurring the line between truth and lies.

There has been a lot of talk in the United States lately about “fake news” (the accusation that President Trump tosses out to discredit unfavorable articles) and “alternative facts” (the phrase that Kellyanne Conway used to justify the White House propagation of falsehoods about the size of the inaugural crowd and other matters). But it’s important to remember that these devices were neither invented in the United States nor confined to our shores. Russia is the world leader in both areas, if in nothing else.

12
Shares
Google+ Print

A Reform to Stand the Test of Time

For Republicans, it’s time to choose: their careers or their country.

While it may be a dated version of a working draft of the GOP’s replacement for the Affordable Care Act, the text of legislation that is circulating in the press provides political observers with a window into how the Republican Party plans to “repeal and replace” ObamaCare. For conservatives, there is a lot in the proposal to like, but also provisions that are troubling. Naturally, the latter will get the most attention. The political intractability of some ObamaCare provisions demonstrates the permanence of sweeping reform legislation and why Republicans might be better served by adjusting their priorities.

7
Shares
Google+ Print

North Korea’s Chemical Terrorism

North Korea Deploys WMD on Malaysian soil.

Hope always springs eternal that newly appointed dictators will be kinder and gentler than their predecessors. But whether it’s Bashar Assad in Syria or Kim Jong-un in North Korea, it turns out that the scions of dictatorial dynasties are even more deadly than their parents and never the “reformers” they were once touted to be. Assad, of course, is responsible for the vast majority of deaths in a Syrian civil war that has claimed as many as half a million victims. Kim, meanwhile, is becoming famous for killing his relatives—first his uncle, Jang Sung-taek, was eliminated in 2013 and now he has assassinated his half-brother, Kim Jong-nam.

6
Shares
Google+ Print

Social Conservatism’s Resurrection

Social conservatism isn't dead. Far from it.

The Trump administration has a peculiar view of federalism. The Trump White House believes the Obama-era guidelines designed to expand restroom access to transgender students are an offense against the 10th Amendment. Yet at the same time, the administration also warned the public to expect a crackdown on those states that have legalized recreational marijuana use. Presumably, unlike public restrooms, that’s an issue the White House believes should not devolve to the states, but the logic here appears arbitrary and contradictory. From a strictly constitutionalist perspective, it is. Only through the lens of social conservatism can this conflict be reconciled.

15
Shares
Google+ Print

Zionism is Not Racism

41 years later, Columbia University students are still equating Zionism with racism.

As part of their annual “Israel Apartheid Week,” the Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, in conjunction with Columbia/Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace, are hosting an event Monday, February 27th entitled “Zionists are Racists.”

31
Shares
Google+ Print