Time for a Do-Over

I asked Jamie Fly, executive director of the Foreign Policy Initiative, about today’s revelations. What’s the significance of the newly revealed facility?

This is very significant and shows once again that Iran cannot be trusted with sensitive nuclear technology, especially the technology required to enrich uranium. President Obama said that “the size and configuration of this facility is inconsistent with a peaceful program.” If this is true, it raises questions about what the consensus in the U.S. intelligence community is now that Iran has resumed its covert nuclear weapons program. It also is troubling that even though President Obama appears to have been aware of this information, he in recent weeks authorized Undersecretary of State William Burns to meet with Iran and other members of the P5+1 next week. What does the administration expect to get out of continued engagement given Iran’s apparent disregard for all of its international obligations? President Obama should have used this information to make an immediate push for crippling sanctions, and he should make clear to Iran that the military option remains on the table if similar covert sites are discovered elsewhere.

What does this tell us about our ability to monitor and verify Iran’s activities?

The fact that Iran was able to develop a facility like this despite being under multiple UN Security Council resolutions which attempt to limit its access to sensitive nuclear technology makes clear that the current sanctions regime is weak and that new types of sanctions need to be explored. It also shows that if the IAEA was unable to learn about this site, it is likely that there are other covert sites that have yet to be discovered. Iran’s nuclear ambitions cannot be managed through international inspections.

Does this violate the existing sanctions already in place?

This violates all of the existing UN Security Council sanctions on Iran. Iran has also violated its obligation to report such facilities to the International Atomic Energy Agency as soon as they enter the planning phase. Unfortunately, President Obama’s response, stressing engagement and dialogue, will send the message to Iran that they can get away with just about anything and still sit down with us to discuss the state of civilization.

Fly makes a key point: what has been lost here is the opportunity to galvanize domestic and international opinion and work toward a meaningful regime of sanctions. Obama hasn’t used the past eight months—or the last week—productively while he had possession of this critical information. Indeed, Obama didn’t use any forum—the General Assembly speech, private meetings with world leaders, or the Security Council—to make any headway toward addressing the Iranian threat. It’s hard in retrospect to figure out what he was doing. Lawmakers are similarly stumped. In a statement, Rep. Tom Price comments on Obama’s approach to Iran to date:

The public revelation of this nuclear facility’s existence illustrates yet again that the current Iranian regime cannot be trusted. The most stunning news, however, is that President Obama was aware of this facility’s existence, understood that it appears non-peaceful, yet still decided to weaken our missile defense capabilities. This administration’s nonchalant attitude about the threat of a missile-borne nuclear attack from Iran is absolutely reckless. Missile defense systems are vital measures that will both deter and defend against the threat of missile-borne attacks. Yet, the Obama administration has scrapped plans for a defensive site in Eastern Europe and has cut $1.2 billion in missile defense funding.

The Obama approach to the world and to our security is unraveling—in Honduras, in the Middle East, with regard to Guantanamo, and now on Iran. By forcing the world into preconceived notions of diplomacy and by willfully ignoring real dangers, they have dug themselves and the U.S. into a mighty big hole. A good place to start digging themselves out would be the immediate passage of stiffing sanctions on Iran and the use of all that Obama charisma to rally world opinion.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Time for a Do-Over

Must-Reads from Magazine

Trump Quietly Gives Putin What He Wants

Quid pro quo?

Until now, the notion that Donald Trump was providing Russia and Vladimir Putin with concessions at the expense of U.S. interests was poorly supported. That all changed on Wednesday afternoon when the Washington Post revealed that Donald Trump ordered his national security advisor and CIA director to scrap a program that provided covert aid to anti-Assad rebels in Syria.

27
Shares
Google+ Print

Voters in the Age of Affect

Is it Trump's posture, or is it simpler than that?

Though it enjoys a level of political dominance unseen since the 1920s, the Republican Party’s agenda is stalled. Yet, despite their failure to repeal and replace ObamaCare, Republicans are damned like Sisyphus to keep trying. Republican office holders must now administer health care’s taxes and subsidies, and the rest of the GOP agenda cannot advance without freeing up the revenue dedicated to the administration of ObamaCare. A dysfunctional, one-party Congress led by an unpopular neophyte in the Oval Office should precipitate a backlash among voters. But that outcome is far from certain. Ubiquitous surveys and studies dedicated to uncovering the mystery that is the curious and contradictory Trump voter suggests that this may indeed be a new political epoch.

11
Shares
Google+ Print

Iran’s Newest Hostage is Different

An escalation.

On July 16, 2017, Iranian Judiciary spokesman Gholamhosein Mohseni Ejehi announced that Iran had sentenced an American to ten years in prison for alleged espionage. An Iranian judiciary website subsequently identified the American as 37-year-old, China-born Xiyue Wang, a Princeton University Ph.D. student in history.

17
Shares
Google+ Print

Trump’s Naïveté on Display in Syria

The hen house is secured.

Eric Edelman–a former undersecretary of defense in the Bush administration, an aide to Vice President Cheney, and one of the most respected foreign policy hands in Washington–wrote that the July 7 meeting in Hamburg between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin was the most disastrous superpower summit since John F. Kennedy met Nikita Khrushchev in 1961. That Cold War-era summit emboldened the Soviets to put up the Berlin Wall and send missiles to Cuba, thus bringing the world to the brink of nuclear war. It’s a harsh judgment, but its essential accuracy is being confirmed by what we have learned since July 7.

39
Shares
Google+ Print

The ‘Intersectionality’ Trap

No more Sister Souljah moments.

Republicans didn’t always scoff dismissively at the self-destructive, reactionary, fractious collection of malcontents who call themselves The Resistance. The hundreds of thousands who marched in the streets following Donald Trump’s election once honestly unnerved the GOP. This grassroots energy culminated in January’s Women’s March, a multi-day event in which nearly two million people mobilized peacefully and, most importantly, sympathetically in opposition to the president. It was the perfect antidote to the violent anti-Trump demonstrations that typified Inauguration Day, and it might have formed the nucleus of a politically potent movement. The fall of the Women’s March exposes the blight weakening the left and crippling the Democratic Party.

79
Shares
Google+ Print