Did We Just Find the Corrupt Hillary Clinton Cash Quid Pro Quo?

Hillary Clinton’s allies and surrogates have been working hard in recent days to discredit the allegations, contained in a forthcoming book, about foreign donations to the Clinton Global Initiative influencing her decisions during her time as secretary of state. But Hillary loyalists are going to find it quite a bit harder to pooh-pooh the furor over Clinton Cash today after the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal reported that the Clinton State Department approved the sale of one of America’s largest uranium mines to a unit of the Russian state nuclear agency after those involved with the sale had donated a staggering $2.35 million to the Clinton charity and former president Bill Clinton had been invited to speak in Moscow by another firm with ties to the Kremlin for an equally astounding $500,000 honorarium. At the very least, the appearance of a conflict of interest behind a decision that seems to strengthen one of America’s leading geopolitical foes is obvious. At worst, those searching for a clear case of a corrupt quid pro quo between the Clintons and foreign donors have found their answer.

35
Shares
Google+ Print

Did We Just Find the Corrupt Hillary Clinton Cash Quid Pro Quo?

Must-Reads from Magazine

Coming to Terms With the Obama Years

Getting history right.

For political observers, it’s regarded as gauche to re-litigate Barack Obama’s presidency amid the chaos and tumult of the Trump years. Many will scoff at the effort to take stock of the precedents set in the last administration, even if the purpose of such an evaluation is to appraise how we got to where we are today. They have a point; dwelling on the last administration can suffice for a counter-narrative with no higher purpose than to give partisan Republicans a way to deflect criticisms away from Trump. But that does not absolve us of our obligation to set the record straight. When it comes to the Obama era, that record is, at times, a disturbing one.

11
Shares
Google+ Print

The World Dawns on Trump

Trump's evolution is frustrating his allies.

The most surprising criticisms of Donald Trump this week may well have come from John Bolton, the former U.N. ambassador who has been a stalwart Trump supporter. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Bolton took Trump to task for, essentially, not being as revolutionary in his approach to foreign policy as his campaign rhetoric would have suggested.

6
Shares
Google+ Print

Manchester, Montana, and Hands

Podcast: On Terrorism in Manchester and hot-headed violence in Montana.

On the final podcast before Memorial Day, the COMMENTARY crew takes on the horror in Manchester and what it means about security, terrorism, and cultural integration. We move on to the assault perpetrated on a reporter by an out-of-control special-election candidate in Montana before concluding with the most important issue we’ve ever covered: Did Melania swat Donald’s hand away? Give a listen.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Just How High Was Iran’s Voter Turnout?

Go to the provinces.

The Islamic Republic of Iran may not be a democracy, but Iran’s leadership does take voter turnout seriously. The Supreme Leader regularly beseeches Iranians to vote, and various regime officials and even Iran’s de facto lobbyists in the United States do cite voter participation as a sign of legitimacy.

4
Shares
Google+ Print

The False Backlash Over Anonymous Sources

Rational skepticism or partisan angst?

To hear Donald Trump’s supporters tell it, the story these days isn’t the story, but how the story is sourced.

12
Shares
Google+ Print