McCain Derangement Syndrome

In 1991, Cindy McCain visited Mother Teresa’s orphanage in Bangladesh and decided to adopt and bring home a terribly sick baby. That baby is now 17 year-old daughter Bridget McCain. About this fact — this noble and extraordinary fact — there is no dispute. So now a person who devotes an inordinate amount of sentimental space on his blog to his beagle — fresh from a few days’ effort to impeach a McCain story about a Vietnamese prison guard who drew the sign of the cross in the dirt in front of him on Christmas Day while he was tied up in ropes by asserting and then backing away from the contention that it was borrowed from Alexander Solzhenitsyn — is trying to make a scandal out of the fact that the McCain website and some news stories feature a possibly untrue tale of Cindy being asked directly by Mother Teresa to take the baby home:

Now, the question is whether and when Cindy McCain met with Mother Teresa….Can we nail down the date of that meeting? Or are these questions no one should dare ask of a POW war hero?

This is evidently beyond the pale, and deserving of the horribly obnoxious inference present in the overheated prose on display here, because “a story that shows the McCains’ genuine compassion and faith is embellished over the years to make the story a little more perfect, a little more salient, a little better as a narrative.” Actually, no. The fact that Cindy McCain would have decided to adopt Bridget on her own and without prompting from a living saint only speaks better of her. There is no other fact here that matters. The search for deceptions in the midst of accounts of entirely praiseworthy behavior is a peculiar undertaking, to say the least. The requirements of civility prevent me from saying more than the least.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

McCain Derangement Syndrome

Must-Reads from Magazine

Syria’s Forsaken Rebels

Has Washington given up on Syria?

Last week, I wrote about one of the troublesome byproducts of the Trump-Putin summit in Hamburg: a ceasefire in southwestern Syria that Israel worries will entrench Iranian control of that area bordering the Israeli Golan Heights. The day after my article came out, the Washington Post reported on another troubling decision that President Trump has made vis a vis Syria: Ending a CIA program that had provided arms and training to anti-Assad forces.

4
Shares
Google+ Print

The Democratic Party’s False Centrism

It's a duck.

Democrats are finally digging out of the wreckage the Obama years wrought, and are beginning to acknowledge the woes they visited upon themselves with their box-checking identity liberalism. So, yes, the opposition is moving forward in the Trump area, but toward what? Schizophrenia, apparently.

12
Shares
Google+ Print

Challenging Violent Speech—Unless It’s About Israel

The border of incitement.

The idea that speech can itself constitute an act of violence grows ever more popular among the left’s leading polemicists. They argue that employing a politically incorrect word can be triggering; that the wrong gender pronoun can provoke; that words and sentences and parts of speech are all acts of aggression in disguise. The left seeks to stop this violence, or less euphemistically: to silence this speech.

34
Shares
Google+ Print

Russian Undressing: An Explanation

Podcast: How bad is it?

On the first of this week’s COMMENTARY podcasts, Noah Rothman and Abe Greenwald join me to sort through—and we do it systematically, which is a first for us—what is going on with the Russia investigation and how it divides into three categories. There’s the question of the probe itself, there’s the question of collusion, and there’s the question of obstruction of justice. It’s really good. I mean it. Give a listen.

2
Shares
Google+ Print

Polish Democracy in the Balance

Democracy dies while the president looks the other way.

Past U.S. presidents have used their bully pulpit to campaign for human-rights and democracy. By encouraging the unprecedented wave of democratization that has swept the world since 1945, their words and actions had consequences. That’s not something that Donald Trump does. Far from it; he positively praises dictators. His words have consequences, too, and they are not good.

10
Shares
Google+ Print