Why Is McCain In It?

Michael Gerson describes why the McCain camp is having some success. Aside from energy policy, Barack Obama’s brand-crushing flip-flops, and the elevation of Steve Schmidt, the McCain forces have gotten some help from The One. Gerson explains:

At least temporarily, Obama’s tactics have raised a damning political question: Who is this man? And the McCain campaign has begun to cleverly exploit these concerns, not with a frontal attack on his liberalism or his flip-flops but with a humorous attack on his “celebrity” — really a proxy for shallowness. The argument is powerful: McCain has roots and convictions. Obama has fans and paparazzi. And Obama’s European trip — more Princess Diana than John Kennedy — served only to confirm these impressions.

Gerson doesn’t quite get to it, but part of the credit also goes to the mainstream media. They sheltered Obama during the primary, perhaps encouraging him later to engage in a bargain basement sale of of his liberal positions (in the mistaken belief they would be too polite to notice). They provided the play-by-play commentary for his Berlin Obamapalooza venture. They tingled and giggled like school girls, which only contributed to the nagging sense that there was something not quite grounded about him. And then of course, embarrassed by his excess — and theirs — they began to steadily turn up the heat on everything from the race card gambit to his energy flip-flops. Like an errant teenager, Obama really did fall in with a bad crowd of media kids who only brought out the worst in him and, in the end, proved to be less than entirely loyal.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Why Is McCain In It?

Must-Reads from Magazine

Iran’s Newest Hostage is Different

An escalation.

On July 16, 2017, Iranian Judiciary spokesman Gholamhosein Mohseni Ejehi announced that Iran had sentenced an American to ten years in prison for alleged espionage. An Iranian judiciary website subsequently identified the American as 37-year-old, China-born Xiyue Wang, a Princeton University Ph.D. student in history.

3
Shares
Google+ Print

Trump’s Naïveté on Display in Syria

The hen house is secured.

Eric Edelman–a former undersecretary of defense in the Bush administration, an aide to Vice President Cheney, and one of the most respected foreign policy hands in Washington–wrote that the July 7 meeting in Hamburg between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin was the most disastrous superpower summit since John F. Kennedy met Nikita Khrushchev in 1961. That Cold War-era summit emboldened the Soviets to put up the Berlin Wall and send missiles to Cuba, thus bringing the world to the brink of nuclear war. It’s a harsh judgment, but its essential accuracy is being confirmed by what we have learned since July 7.

36
Shares
Google+ Print

The ‘Intersectionality’ Trap

No more Sister Souljah moments.

Republicans didn’t always scoff dismissively at the self-destructive, reactionary, fractious collection of malcontents who call themselves The Resistance. The hundreds of thousands who marched in the streets following Donald Trump’s election once honestly unnerved the GOP. This grassroots energy culminated in January’s Women’s March, a multi-day event in which nearly two million people mobilized peacefully and, most importantly, sympathetically in opposition to the president. It was the perfect antidote to the violent anti-Trump demonstrations that typified Inauguration Day, and it might have formed the nucleus of a politically potent movement. The fall of the Women’s March exposes the blight weakening the left and crippling the Democratic Party.

53
Shares
Google+ Print

Apparently, There Is an Academic Medievalist Far Left

Madness.

Even “Game of Thrones” has not quite rescued medieval studies from its reputation for stodginess. Yet the organizers of this year’s International Medieval Congress must have thought their fellow scholars would think them a teensy bit cool for selecting the theme “otherness.”

19
Shares
Google+ Print

Should the U.S. Revive Nuclear Power?

Keeping the lights on.

Progressives, environmentalists, politicians, and even many corporations have dedicated themselves to increasing the amount of alternative energy Americans produce and use. To many Americans, this means foregoing coal and oil in favor of wind, hydroelectric, or solar power. Fights over the Keystone XL pipeline or Dakota Access Pipeline have less to do with fears of spillage or respect for Native American sacred ground and more to do with antipathy toward expanding gas and oil use and encouraging any further development or exploitation of Canadian oil reserves, especially from Alberta’s tar sands.

8
Shares
Google+ Print