Obama’s Three-Part Foreign Policy Record

Bret Stephens’ stellar column in the Wall Street Journal today succinctly summarizes President Obama’s record of foreign failures:

His failed personal effort to bring the 2016 Olympics to Chicago. His failed personal effort to negotiate a climate-change deal at Copenhagen in 2009. His failed efforts to strike a nuclear deal with Iran that year and this year. His failed effort to improve America’s public standing in the Muslim world with the now-forgotten Cairo speech. His failed reset with Russia. His failed effort to strong-arm Israel into a permanent settlement freeze. His failed (if half-hearted) effort to maintain a residual U.S. military force in Iraq. His failed efforts to cut deals with the Taliban and reach out to North Korea. His failed effort to win over China and Russia for even a symbolic U.N. condemnation of Syria’s Bashar Assad. His failed efforts to intercede in Europe’s economic crisis.

Stephens credits Obama with success in Libya (although the kinetic military operation was conducted in “a reluctant, last-minute, half-embarrassed fashion”), eliminating Osama bin Laden and expanding drone strikes (although the “tawdry efforts to publicize them for political gain will forever diminish the achievement”).

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Obama’s Three-Part Foreign Policy Record

Must-Reads from Magazine

Zionism is Not Racism

41 years later, Columbia University students are still equating Zionism with racism.

As part of their annual “Israel Apartheid Week,” the Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, in conjunction with Columbia/Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace, are hosting an event Monday, February 27th entitled “Zionists are Racists.”

6
Shares
Google+ Print

Democrats in Denial

The Democratic Party refuses to come to terms with Obama's failures.

Democrats are struggling to reconcile an existential contradiction. They know that something has gone terribly wrong with their party and that it must adapt to new political realities. But they also know Hillary Clinton won 3 million more votes than Donald Trump, and that grassroots Democrats are energized—spontaneously crowding Republican town halls, marching in the streets, and paralyzing airports. Which means that some Democrats are now certain it’s not their party but the country that must change. This confused line of thought was on display at Wednesday night’s debate among candidates vying to chair the Democratic National Committee. This paralyzing cognitive dissonance has put the Democratic Party on a path toward an eerily familiar sort of internecine turmoil.

6
Shares
Google+ Print

Is Trumpism Starting to Take Shape?

Commentary podcast: Deportations, the DNC, and conservatism's devolution.

On the last of this week’s podcast, the COMMENTARY crew discusses the problems with the new deportation policies, ventilates on the Democratic National Committee’s race for chair, and wonders whether Trump is wooing the conservative movement or whether the conservative movement has already surrendered its purity to his seductions. Give a listen.

1
Shares
Google+ Print

Whom Do You Trust?

No one outside media or the White House thinks either is trusted.

For a window into the reporting industry’s crisis of confidence, look no further than the Washington Post’s new motto: “Democracy dies in darkness.” This is about as close to a self-indulgent pep rally for the beleaguered press as there is. The admission implicit in this new mission statement is that the public’s mistrust of journalism and the president’s attacks on the vocation are taking their toll. As CBS News anchor John Dickerson put it, and for reasons cataloged in countless studies and think pieces, the press did the “work of ruining its reputation on its own.” There will, however, always be ways in which the press can lift its spirits. The latest reprieve comes courtesy of the pollsters at Quinnipiac University. But this, too, may be illusory.

31
Shares
Google+ Print

Our Despised Majority

Balancing majority and minority rights and privileges is lawmaker's task.

If you wanted to distill the breathtaking stupidity of our modern age into a single anecdote, you could do no better than New York Times reporter Daniel Victor’s latest effort.

47
Shares
Google+ Print