Sounds Like Those Employees Are Getting a Raw Deal

Card check has become a legislative quagmire for Big Labor in more ways than one. It seems that the SEIU has wrecked its finances with all the political lobbying efforts, taking out $25 million in loans last year and seeing its net assets plunge to $34 million from $64 million. And of course the little guys suffer and get laid off when management messes up. (Hmm, not a good sign if they want to run car companies.) We hear from Andy Stern: “We maxed out the credit card and now we’re paying it off.” The Wall Street Journal explains:

Labor experts say it is unusual for unions to take out big loans. Usually, they rely on member dues and interest from investments. “I would say SEIU is overextended,” said Nelson Lichtenstein, a labor historian .  . . “I would say that clearly the union bet the ranch that this investment was going to pay enormous dividends and those dividends ultimately have to come in the form of new members,” said Michael Lotito, a management-side attorney with Jackson Lewis LLP. “Without a fundamental change in the way unions gather up new members, the return on investment is going to be found lacking.”

One wonders what the average SEIU union member must think of this. Their dues are being used to try and foist card check and mandatory arbitration on a wary public while the union engages in a blood feud with the rest of organized labor and lays off its own employees. If this is the model for a new era in labor relations, perhaps they might want to rethink the whole endeavor.

0
Shares
Google+ Print

Sounds Like Those Employees Are Getting a Raw Deal

Must-Reads from Magazine

The Democratic Party’s False Centrism

It's a duck.

Democrats are finally digging out of the wreckage the Obama years wrought, and are beginning to acknowledge the woes they visited upon themselves with their box-checking identity liberalism. So, yes, the opposition is moving forward in the Trump area, but toward what? Schizophrenia, apparently.

10
Shares
Google+ Print

Challenging Violent Speech—Unless It’s About Israel

The border of incitement.

The idea that speech can itself constitute an act of violence grows ever more popular among the left’s leading polemicists. They argue that employing a politically incorrect word can be triggering; that the wrong gender pronoun can provoke; that words and sentences and parts of speech are all acts of aggression in disguise. The left seeks to stop this violence, or less euphemistically: to silence this speech.

11
Shares
Google+ Print

Russian Undressing: An Explanation

Podcast: How bad is it?

On the first of this week’s COMMENTARY podcasts, Noah Rothman and Abe Greenwald join me to sort through—and we do it systematically, which is a first for us—what is going on with the Russia investigation and how it divides into three categories. There’s the question of the probe itself, there’s the question of collusion, and there’s the question of obstruction of justice. It’s really good. I mean it. Give a listen.

1
Shares
Google+ Print

Polish Democracy in the Balance

Democracy dies while the president looks the other way.

Past U.S. presidents have used their bully pulpit to campaign for human-rights and democracy. By encouraging the unprecedented wave of democratization that has swept the world since 1945, their words and actions had consequences. That’s not something that Donald Trump does. Far from it; he positively praises dictators. His words have consequences, too, and they are not good.

8
Shares
Google+ Print

How Corruption Cripples American Universities

Are the rewards worth the costs?

Universities may be non-profit, but they are big business. At the end of fiscal year 2015, for example, Harvard, Yale, and Princeton’s endowments were $38 billion, $26 billion, and $22 billion respectively. Those are correspondingly equivalent to the gross domestic products of Mongolia, Cyprus, and the West Bank and Gaza. University presidents make salaries on par with and often higher than corporate CEOs. Fundraising—traveling the world glad-handing alumni and lobbying—rather than academe has become the primary function of many university presidents.

7
Shares
Google+ Print