The Debate Democrats Can’t Have

The over 18 million Americans who tuned to CNN on Tuesday night for the first Republican presidential debate since the terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino might have been pleasantly surprised. American anxieties over the threat of radical Islamic terrorism are nearing or surpassing their immediate post-9/11 peaks, and those who turned on the news to hear a substantive debate over the near-and long-term security challenges facing the nation were privy to one. For Democrats, this has proven frustrating. Theirs is a party that cannot have a serious debate over matters related to national security without condemning their party’s leader and his brand of crisis management and, thus, jeopardizing its own electoral viability in the process.

160
Shares
Google+ Print

The Debate Democrats Can’t Have

Must-Reads from Magazine

Zionism is Not Racism

41 years later, Columbia University students are still equating Zionism with racism.

As part of their annual “Israel Apartheid Week,” the Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, in conjunction with Columbia/Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace, are hosting an event Monday, February 27th entitled “Zionists are Racists.”

9
Shares
Google+ Print

Democrats in Denial

The Democratic Party refuses to come to terms with Obama's failures.

Democrats are struggling to reconcile an existential contradiction. They know that something has gone terribly wrong with their party and that it must adapt to new political realities. But they also know Hillary Clinton won 3 million more votes than Donald Trump, and that grassroots Democrats are energized—spontaneously crowding Republican town halls, marching in the streets, and paralyzing airports. Which means that some Democrats are now certain it’s not their party but the country that must change. This confused line of thought was on display at Wednesday night’s debate among candidates vying to chair the Democratic National Committee. This paralyzing cognitive dissonance has put the Democratic Party on a path toward an eerily familiar sort of internecine turmoil.

13
Shares
Google+ Print

Is Trumpism Starting to Take Shape?

Commentary podcast: Deportations, the DNC, and conservatism's devolution.

On the last of this week’s podcast, the COMMENTARY crew discusses the problems with the new deportation policies, ventilates on the Democratic National Committee’s race for chair, and wonders whether Trump is wooing the conservative movement or whether the conservative movement has already surrendered its purity to his seductions. Give a listen.

2
Shares
Google+ Print

Whom Do You Trust?

No one outside media or the White House thinks either is trusted.

For a window into the reporting industry’s crisis of confidence, look no further than the Washington Post’s new motto: “Democracy dies in darkness.” This is about as close to a self-indulgent pep rally for the beleaguered press as there is. The admission implicit in this new mission statement is that the public’s mistrust of journalism and the president’s attacks on the vocation are taking their toll. As CBS News anchor John Dickerson put it, and for reasons cataloged in countless studies and think pieces, the press did the “work of ruining its reputation on its own.” There will, however, always be ways in which the press can lift its spirits. The latest reprieve comes courtesy of the pollsters at Quinnipiac University. But this, too, may be illusory.

31
Shares
Google+ Print

Our Despised Majority

Balancing majority and minority rights and privileges is lawmaker's task.

If you wanted to distill the breathtaking stupidity of our modern age into a single anecdote, you could do no better than New York Times reporter Daniel Victor’s latest effort.

48
Shares
Google+ Print